← Back to issue

Married men earned 50% more than never-married men—but marriage may not be the cause

Political Guyentist · July 30, 20261 min read

BLS

The wage gap is real; longitudinal data suggest much of it appears before the wedding.

Men’s wages rise before marriage in the NLSY79 longitudinal sampleReplot and analysis: Crémieux; data: NLSY79; method follows Dougherty (2005)

The BLS figures compare different groups at one point in time; they do not show that marriage caused the higher pay. The longitudinal analysis found that men’s earnings began rising roughly six years before marriage, and a younger NLSY97 cohort showed the same broad pattern. Older first-time grooms showed no premium, men in “shotgun” marriages had the same premarital gains as other grooms, and wage declines often began before divorce. The likelier explanation is selection and maturation: traits and life changes that make marriage more likely may also raise earnings.

Figure 1Chart

Married men out-earned never-married men by half

A longitudinal sample found men's earnings began rising roughly six years before marriage, so much of this gap appears before the wedding.

Married men out-earned never-married men by halfGrouped bars of 2023 median usual weekly earnings for full-time workers: married men $1,421 against never-married men $945, and married women $1,143 against never-married women $876. At Men, a note reads "Different men compared at one moment — not the same men before and after".
MarriedNever married
The numbers
Married men out-earned never-married men by half
Median weekly earnings, full-time workers, 2023MarriedNever marriedNote
Men$1,421$945a 50% gap
Women$1,143$876a 30% gap

4 claims checked in this story. All graded high confidence.