← Back to issue

Extra pandemic school aid displaced local taxes—but did not measurably raise scores

Political Guyentist · July 27, 20261 min read

NBER

Districts receiving more federal money collected less local revenue and reopened faster, without increasing per-pupil spending or test scores.

[UPDATE]

Paper co-author Philip Hoxie supplied useful scale in an explanatory thread: the event-study chart shows the local-revenue gap widening to roughly $500 per pupil by 2022. He also stressed an important limit on the result: the estimate applies to a relatively small, affluent slice of districts near the funding cutoff, with almost no Southern districts in the sample.

[UPDATE2]

Education-policy researcher Vladimir Kogan pointed to the tension with other studies that found positive achievement effects from pandemic aid. His proposed reconciliation is external validity: districts clustered around this particular 5% threshold may be unusual, so the paper’s local estimate need not describe the full universe of school districts.

Currently showing Local school revenue fell after extra federal aid arrived
Local school revenue fell after extra federal aid arrived
Local school revenue fell after extra federal aid arrived Dot plot showing estimated changes in local revenue per pupil for school districts just above the ESSER eligibility threshold: minus 107 dollars in 2020, minus 301 dollars in 2021, and minus 500 dollars in 2022, with 95 percent confidence intervals. Local school revenue fell after extra federal aid arrived Estimated difference per pupil for districts just above the ESSER eligibility cutoff Extra ESSER aid: about +$388 per pupil 2020 -$107 2021 -$301 2022 -$500 -$800 -$600 -$400 -$200 $0 +$200 Change in local revenue per pupil Whiskers show 95% confidence intervals; 2019 is the reference year. Negative values mean districts collected less local revenue than comparable districts below the cutoff. Source: NBER Working Paper 35447, Figure 3 and Table 5