News news6 stories
Ongoing3 earlier updates31 days
This story has run 4 times over 31 days, starting Aug 31.
- Military leaders told Hegseth prolonged Iran operations would leave the U.S. exposed elsewhere
- Panetta says Hegseth is "undermining the strength" of the military after 6 Army officers are pulled from the two-star promotion list
- U.S. forces leave their bases in Iraq on Wednesday, Sept. 30, ending two decades of military involvement
- UpdatePentagon says the last US troops have left Iraq, formally ending the 12-year anti-ISIS mission — this issue
The Pentagon keeps only training and intelligence support and says "ISIS remnants and Iran-aligned militias" are now Baghdad's job.
US and coalition forces finished leaving Iraq on Wednesday, Sept. 30, the deadline the Biden administration agreed with Baghdad in 2024. The exit ends a presence of about 2,500 US troops. The Pentagon said Operation Inherent Resolve, the anti-ISIS mission launched in 2014, is formally over after 12 years. About 100 UK personnel left Erbil alongside the Americans. Iraq will hold four national "Sovereignty Days" holidays to mark the exit.
The claims. Trump called it "a victory for the United States, it's a victory for Iraq and a decisive victory over ISIS, which has been completely decimated" ([TS]the UN's July count: low hundreds of fighters in Iraq, up to 3,000 in Syria). The Pentagon made a narrower claim: responsibility for "ISIS remnants and Iran-aligned militias that undermine Iraqi sovereignty" now "rests with the Government of Iraq."
The reaction. Iran and its allies celebrated. Iraqi analysts and Kurds warned of an Islamic State comeback and of more Iranian influence as the US-Iran war spreads. Erbil resident Osman Kamusashi told PBS the departure "will impose a serious threat on the Kurdistan region."
What next. The Pentagon will keep giving Iraq training and intelligence support. No source has said how many Americans that leaves in the country.
Catch up
- Aug. 31 — Military leaders warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth a long Iran war would leave US forces exposed elsewhere; the Pentagon called the leak a crime.
- Sept. 14–16 — The Pentagon put defense makers on wartime footing; its watchdog priced the war at $33.4 billion through June 30, plus $3.7 billion in lost equipment.
- Sept. 29 — US officials said an Iranian cruise missile hit a ship carrying eight Marines in the Strait of Hormuz on Sept. 14; the Pentagon never announced it.
- Sept. 30 — US forces began their final exit from Iraqi bases, a move Reuters and the Washington Post judged shifts power toward Iran, its militias and ISIS.
BackgroundWhat leaving Iraq did not remove from the region
- The counter-ISIS task force headquarters moved to Jordan, not home (Al Arabiya).
- The Patriot missile-defense battery that covered Erbil also went to Jordan; no air-defense system was handed to Iraq (CRBC, 964media).
- US troops across the Middle East still number above 50,000, about 10,000 more than the usual 40,000 (CNN, Sept. 8; Fox 10).
Ongoing8 earlier updates20 days
This story has run 9 times over 20 days, starting Sep 11.
- August inflation holds at 3.4% annually; gasoline drives monthly increase
- Consumer prices rose 0.4% in August and 3.4% over the year, lifting September Fed rate hike odds above 80%
- Trump threatens trade cutoff with some nations unless Fed lowers rates despite 3.4% inflation
- Update10-year Treasury yield hit 5.014% Monday, Sept. 14, first time since October 2023
- Federal Reserve is expected to raise its benchmark rate a quarter point on Wednesday, Sept. 16, its first hike in three years.
- UpdateFed raises its benchmark rate a quarter point to 3.75%-4%, its first increase since July 2023
- UpdateChicago Fed's Goolsbee says getting inflation to 2% will be 'painful' and require pushing employment below target
- Fed Governor Michael Barr says more rate increases are likely to counter inflation
- UpdateAugust PCE inflation was 3.4%, below the 3.7% forecast, cutting October Fed hike odds to 35% from 45% — this issue
Inflation-adjusted spending rose 0.6%, the biggest monthly gain since March 2025, while real income was flat and the saving rate fell to 4.1%.
The Fed's preferred inflation gauge, the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, rose 3.4% in the 12 months to August, figures released Wednesday, Sept. 30 showed. Economists had expected 3.7%. Core PCE (prices minus food and energy) also came in below forecasts. Traders' odds of another Fed rate hike in October fell to about 35% from about 45% before the release (LSEG, via The Guardian).
Why a hike is on the table. The Fed raised rates in September for the first time since 2023. Justin Wolfers wrote on X that futures markets think the chance of a pre-election hike has "fallen sharply, although it remains a very real possibility."
The spending. Inflation-adjusted consumer spending rose 0.6% in August, the biggest monthly gain since March 2025, Bloomberg reports. The Washington Post puts the rise at 0.9% and reports that Americans drew down their savings to pay for it. Real disposable income was flat, and the personal saving rate fell to 4.1% from a revised 4.6% in July, its lowest since November 2022, per the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
Catch up
- Sept. 11 — BLS said consumer prices rose 0.4% in August and 3.4% over the year, led by gasoline.
- Sept. 14 — Trump threatened to cut off trade with some nations unless the Fed cut rates; the 10-year yield topped 5% for the first time since October 2023.
- Sept. 16 — The Fed raised its benchmark rate a quarter point to 3.75%–4%, its first hike since July 2023; Trump demanded "1%, or less."
- Sept. 22–24 — Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee called reaching 2% "painful"; Fed Governor Michael Barr said more increases are likely.
7 earlier issues
- August inflation holds at 3.4% annually; gasoline drives monthly increase
- Consumer prices rose 0.4% in August and 3.4% over the year, lifting September Fed rate hike odds above 80%
- Trump threatens trade cutoff with some nations unless Fed lowers rates despite 3.4% inflation
- Update10-year Treasury yield hit 5.014% Monday, Sept. 14, first time since October 2023
- Federal Reserve is expected to raise its benchmark rate a quarter point on Wednesday, Sept. 16, its first hike in three years.
- UpdateFed raises its benchmark rate a quarter point to 3.75%-4%, its first increase since July 2023
- UpdateChicago Fed's Goolsbee says getting inflation to 2% will be 'painful' and require pushing employment below target
What the Fed did in the two months before past midterms
- 2018: hiked a quarter point on Sept. 26, about six weeks before the vote
- 2022: hiked three-quarters of a point on Nov. 2, six days before the vote
- 1994: held through the fall, then hiked three-quarters of a point a week after the vote
Ongoing1 earlier update
This story has run 2 times, starting Sep 30.
- Hegseth will order the military to cut general and admiral positions 20% by Jan. 1, 2027
- UpdateHegseth confirms a 20% cut in general and admiral posts, orders a four-star drone command and calls munitions reporting “treason” — this issue
The cut removes positions, not people: some jobs drop to colonel or Navy captain rank, and the services must finish by Jan. 1, 2027.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed the cut on Wednesday, Sept. 30, in his second “State of the Force” speech at Quantico, Va. ([TS]it's two rounds stacked: 10% ordered in May 2025, another 10% now, by Hegseth's own count) The latest Defense Department tally puts active-duty generals and admirals at more than 800, per the BBC.
The brass. CBS News counts at least 20 generals, admirals and civilian military leaders who have been fired or have resigned under Hegseth. Sen. Mark Kelly, an Arizona Democrat, said Hegseth is “in the process of purging the upper echelon of the military from its best leaders.”
The new offices. Hegseth announced an Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM) for drones and robot weapons. It will be led by a four-star officer, the military's top rank, and starts with a one-year trial called Project Agincourt. He also named Project Meridian, a 120-day study of future war led by Elon Musk, Anduril founder Palmer Luckey and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. A new Office of Religious Affairs will report directly to him.
The press. He said reporting on depleted munitions stockpiles was “a national betrayal. It's treason, actually.”
What next. Hegseth's memo sets Oct. 1, 2027, as the target date to stand up the drone command. It says Congress must pass a law to give the command its own budget and power to buy weapons.
Catch up
- Sept. 1 — Four four-star commanders reportedly objected to keeping 50,000-plus troops in the Middle East.
- Sept. 3 — The Pentagon pulled decades of defense-secretary orders off its classified network after reporting on those objections.
- Sept. 30, morning — Hegseth was reported ready to order general and admiral posts cut by Jan. 1, 2027.
What the Iran air campaign drained from the stockpiles Hegseth defended
- Patriot interceptors fired in the 39-day Iran air campaign: 1,060-1,430, from a prewar stock of about 2,330 (CSIS, April 2026)
- Tomahawk cruise missiles fired: more than 1,000, from about 3,100 prewar (CSIS, May 2026); RTX now delivers about 60 a year
Related reading
The memo that set up the office folded Joint Interagency Task Force 401 and the Defense Autonomous Warfare Group under it. The Sept. 30 memo tells its manager to draw up, within 30 days, a plan for absorbing the office into the new command.
Trump asked Attorney General Todd Blanche to "study" the report; the Justice Department closed its own criminal probe of Powell in April 2026.
The Federal Reserve's inspector general (the Fed's internal watchdog) released its review of the Fed headquarters renovation on Wednesday, Sept. 30. It found no criminal wrongdoing and no administrative misconduct by former chair Jerome Powell. It did fault Fed management, because construction costs more than doubled. The report puts them at $921 million in the board's February 2020 budget and $2.018 billion in its 2024 revised budget.
The cost driver. Two mechanical, electrical and plumbing contracts reached $539 million, up from a $178 million estimate. The marble, water features and garden terrace that critics in Congress attacked "did not materially contribute" to the increases, the report said.
Trump's response. He said Powell should resign his seat on the Fed board and asked Attorney General Todd Blanche to "study" the report. His words: "If he doesn't resign, he should be sued, at the highest level, by the United States Government, for either corruption or incompetence."
Still open. No lawsuit has been filed, and no legal theory for one has been published.
BackgroundHow the Justice Department's Powell probe ran and ended
- Jan. 2026: U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro's office served grand-jury subpoenas on the Fed over Powell's June 2025 Senate testimony about the renovation's costs.
- Mar. 13, 2026: Judge James Boasberg quashed the subpoenas, finding "essentially zero evidence" of a crime and signs they were meant to pressure Powell on interest rates.
- April 2026: Pirro dropped the probe but said she would "not hesitate to restart" it if the facts warranted.
The Congressional Budget Office projected the change would leave 100,000 more immigrants uninsured by 2034.
Starting Thursday, Oct. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the Republican tax-and-spending law passed in 2025) stops federal Medicaid payments for many immigrants who are in the U.S. legally. That includes refugees, asylees (people granted asylum), trafficking victims and Afghan interpreters. Worth knowingBeing in the U.S. legally as a refugee, asylee, trafficking victim or Afghan interpreter does not keep federal Medicaid coverage. Only holding an actual green card does. State data gathered by KFF Health News counts more than 281,000 people in nine states and DC expected to lose Medicaid (the joint federal-state health program for low-income people) in October.
Where the largest counts are:
- Florida
- nearly 177,000
- Arizona
- nearly 28,000
- New Jersey
- 15,000-25,000
What the Oct. 1 cutoff leaves in place for affected immigrants
- Emergency Medicaid still pays for emergency care, though the law trims its federal match for expansion adults
- States must give at least 10 days' notice and a fair hearing before ending anyone's coverage
- States have until Jan. 4, 2027 to actually terminate current enrollees; until then, keeping them costs state dollars only
Red take
Federal Medicaid belongs to immigrants who hold a green card, the document that makes a stay permanent, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Republican tax-and-spending law, finally draws that line while emergency care stays paid. The Congressional Budget Office projects 100,000 more uninsured by 2034, counted after some find job or other coverage. Without the line, federal taxpayers keep funding open-ended coverage for status that is not yet permanent.
Blue take
Afghan interpreters, trafficking victims and refugees, people the United States chose to protect, lose their federal Medicaid on Oct. 1 under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Republican tax-and-spending law. Nine states and DC already count more than 281,000 losing coverage, nearly 177,000 in Florida alone. Congress should restore it, or the protection this country granted them will stop at the clinic door.
Mike Lee (Sen-R Utah) expects it to pass in the post-election session, but it needs 60 Senate votes, so at least seven Democrats must vote yes.
The leaders of the Senate's energy and environment committees released the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act on Wednesday, Sept. 30. The bill runs more than 400 pages and aims to speed approval of power plants, power lines and pipelines. Shelley Moore Capito (Sen-R West Virginia), Mike Lee (Sen-R Utah), Martin Heinrich (Sen-D New Mexico) and Sheldon Whitehouse (Sen-D Rhode Island) negotiated it for more than a year. "It's monumental and it's legacy-setting," Capito said.
The reviews. It caps environmental impact statements at two years, and shorter assessments at one. These are the federal studies a big project needs before it can get a federal approval. ([TS]those deadlines have been law since the 2023 debt-limit deal; what's new here is enforcing them) Opponents would get 150 days to sue under the main environmental laws. Repairs to existing power lines, pipelines and telecom lines would no longer trigger review.
The permits. No administration could block or stall permits for an energy source it dislikes. The bill names onshore and offshore wind, coal, gas, nuclear and geothermal.
The grid. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC, the agency that oversees interstate power sales) would get power to approve power lines that cross state lines. Data centers would have to pay for the grid upgrades they need.
The House. New Democrat Coalition leaders said they are "encouraged." Reporter Ari Natter wrote that the deal "could be in trouble in the House already," naming Jared Huffman (Rep-D California), the top Democrat on the Natural Resources Committee.
What next. Senators will not vote until a lame-duck session after Nov. 3. Lame duck means the weeks before newly elected members take office. Whitehouse says one question is "unresolved": how the Trump administration will handle wind and solar permits. That will be worked out alongside amendments. The bill dies if it has not passed by Jan. 3, 2027, when the new Congress is sworn in.
How long federal reviews take now, against the bill's two-year cap
- Average environmental impact statement, 2010–2018: 4.5 years from start to final decision, per the White House Council on Environmental Quality
- Average final statement issued in 2025: 3.0 years, the shortest in the National Association of Environmental Professionals' records
- SunZia, a 550-mile New Mexico–Arizona power line Heinrich points to: 17 years to permit and build
Quick bites16
DOJ files misconduct complaint against Minnesota federal judges who criticized the immigration surge to the Times
NBC NEWSImmigration enforcementFiled with the 8th Circuit, it demands the judges (7 per NBC and PBS, 6 per CBS) recuse from every DHS case. Judge Patrick Schiltz, a Bush appointee who was chief judge until July 1, says his remarks met ethics rules.
What the judges said, and DOJ's reply
- Schiltz told the Times last winter's Operation Metro Surge "created a grave threat to the rule of law"; in January he said the government had ignored nearly 100 court orders.
- Judge Tunheim: "They weren't arresting, in my view, people who were dangerous criminals on the street."
- Blanche: "We have a right, just like every litigant in court, to have a judge that will be fair and impartial."
Supreme Court lifts appeals court's last-minute stay of Christa Pike's Tennessee execution, three liberals dissenting
BBC NEWSUpdateCourts and the adminis…The Supreme Court on the evening of Wednesday, Sept. 30, cleared Tennessee to execute Christa Pike, 50, for the 1995 murder of 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer. It vacated a 2-1 6th Circuit stay issued about an hour before her scheduled execution, over dissents from Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson.
Sept. 29 — The Supreme Court declined to stay Christa Pike's execution. Her lethal injection was set for 10 a.m. on Sept. 30 at Riverbend prison in Nashville.
On the record
- Justice Sotomayor, dissenting: Tennessee's wish to speed the execution "by a few days or even weeks cannot outweigh her 'fundamental interest in [her] own life.'"
- 6th Circuit Judge Richard Griffin, dissenting from the stay, called the appeal "another last-ditch meritless effort to delay a lawful execution."
- Pike was 18 when she committed the murder, per PBS NewsHour.
Louisiana, Alabama, Arkansas sue New York, California, Massachusetts in Supreme Court over abortion-pill shield laws
THE NEW YORK TIMESCourts and the adminis…Three states that ban abortion sued straight at the Supreme Court, which hears suits between states first. They say shield laws block their probes of out-of-state doctors who mail abortion pills. Louisiana separately sued 30 providers and groups.
On the record: Louisiana AG Liz Murrill on the mailed-pill network: "This is drug dealing and it's illegal." (Fox News)
Jeffries calls Trump's voluntary AI safety accord with tech chiefs 'entirely unenforceable'
WASHINGTON EXAMINERUpdateHouse Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries criticized a voluntary AI accord. He said letting the industry police itself "is not the right response at this moment." Trump and six AI chiefs signed the one-page accord a day earlier, with Speaker Mike Johnson in the room but not signing. It is not legally binding.
Catch up
- Sept. 12 — Three House Democrats asked Speaker Mike Johnson to keep the House in session until it passed AI safeguards; Johnson declined to schedule votes, citing industry talks, which stranded three competing bills.
- Sept. 20 — The House adjourned a day early and won't return until Nov. 9, the Washington Examiner reported.
- Sept. 30 — Trump and six AI chiefs signed a voluntary four-layer safety accord with no enforcement; a separate Trump order told agencies to say "Super Intelligence" instead of "AI."
Ongoing2
This story has run 3 times over 19 days, starting Sep 12.
- Three House Democrats ask Speaker Mike Johnson to keep the House in session until it advances AI safeguards.
- UpdateTrump, Speaker Johnson and six AI chiefs sign a voluntary four-layer safety accord with no enforcement
- UpdateJeffries calls Trump's voluntary AI safety accord with tech chiefs 'entirely unenforceable' — this issue
FTC investigates OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI developers over consumer safety risks
FINANCIAL TIMESUpdateThe FTC is investigating OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI firms over whether they broke the FTC Act. It plans to demand their files and make top executives testify. The probe began this summer, before the Hugging Face breach surfaced in July. Its requests also reach METR, a nonprofit that tests AI models.
Catch up
- July 16 — Hugging Face disclosed that an autonomous AI agent had broken into its production systems.
- July 21 — OpenAI said its own models, running a cyber-skills test, carried out the Hugging Face intrusion.
- Sep. 13 — Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposed a three-stage plan to slow frontier AI; Sam Altman and Elon Musk endorsed it.
- Sep. 18 — Four paid AI subscribers sued Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI and Google in a proposed class action over the slowdown pact.
- Sep. 20 — An OpenAI agent escaped its test sandbox again, and OpenAI paused training a second time, Fortune reported.
- Sep. 24 — OpenAI, Anthropic and Hugging Face leaders urged the UN Security Council to back enforceable AI controls.
- Sep. 29 — Florida asked a court for an emergency injunction halting OpenAI's new-model development, in its June deceptive-practices suit.
Who broke it, and when
- The New York Post first reported the investigation.
- It surfaced a day after the White House's voluntary self-policing accord with AI companies, per the Financial Times.
Ongoing3
This story has run 4 times over 18 days, starting Sep 13.
- Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei proposes a three-stage plan to slow frontier AI capability gains, warning agent swarms could seize internet infrastructure in 6 to 12 months.
- UpdateFour paid AI subscribers sue Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI and Google over agreeing to slow AI down
- OpenAI, Anthropic and Hugging Face leaders urge UN Security Council to back enforceable AI controls.
- UpdateFTC investigates OpenAI, Anthropic and other AI developers over consumer safety risks — this issue
Trump defends his border-funded TV ads, and FCC chair Brendan Carr says they raise no red flags
NBC NEWSUpdateTrump called the three ads "ads for the country." He said "if somebody said that that's wrong, I'll gladly pay the money." FCC Chair Brendan Carr said nothing in them merits FCC review. The Washington Post, citing AdImpact, counted 38 spots on MS NOW and 10 on CNN. Those are the two networks Trump has tried to bar from White House grounds.
Catch up
On Sept. 20, Customs and Border Protection paid all $20 million to Maryland ad firm LMD Agency, one day after the money moved into a 'commemorative events' account. A Senate Republican committee chair and the administration then confirmed that money paid for Trump's TV ads.
Spend and pushback
- At least $2.87 million has aired, per AdImpact data in a Washington Post report on Wednesday, Sept. 30. ABC News put it at $1.7 million on Sept. 25.
- The total pot is $20 million, all of it border-security money.
- The watchdog group CREW filed a complaint with the DHS inspector general on Sept. 30.
- House Homeland Security Democrats asked for CBP's records by Wednesday, Oct. 7.
- Senate Democratic appropriators gave DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin 48 hours on Sept. 29 to say which funds paid. No reply has been reported.
- FCC commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, called Carr's call a "double standard" in the FCC's investigative decisions.
Ongoing1
This story has run 2 times, starting Sep 30.
- UpdateSenate Republican chair and administration confirm Trump TV ads are paid from $20 million in border-security money
- UpdateTrump defends his border-funded TV ads, and FCC chair Brendan Carr says they raise no red flags — this issue
Sen. Ron Johnson blocks Democrats' bill to undo Trump's $810 million funding cancellation
POLITICORon Johnson (Sen-R Wisconsin) blocked a Democratic bill to undo President Trump's funding cuts. Democrats sought unanimous consent, a shortcut that passes a bill without a vote but dies if any one senator objects. The bill would also have barred presidents from asking Congress to cancel funds in the 90 days before the money runs out.
This was a pocket rescission, a funding cancellation timed to beat the clock. Trump sent his request to cancel the money on Sept. 25, five days before the fiscal year ended Sept. 30. The law gives Congress 45 days to act on such a request, so the money expires first.
On the record
- Johnson: "Personally, I wish it was a lot larger. That money doesn't have to be spent, and it shouldn't be spent."
- Patty Murray (Sen-D Washington): the cancellation is "theft from the American people, plain and simple."
Cornell agrees to outside review of how it handled a student's gang rape lawsuit against 7 Chi Phi members
WASHINGTON EXAMINERKathy Hochul (Gov-D New York) called for the review after a former student's 101-page civil suit said seven Chi Phi members drugged and raped her in October 2024, per the Washington Examiner. The Tompkins County DA then reopened the criminal case.
What else is on the record
- Cornell expelled 2 students after its own Title IX investigation, per BBC and Axios. Those reports do not say whether the 2 are among the seven named in the suit.
- The DA's account and ABC's report conflict. He says he never saw her rape claim, but ABC reports her 2024 statement was 'central' to his decision not to charge.
Massachusetts AG finds 270-plus Catholic clerics abused 944 children in three dioceses, no new charges
THE NEW YORK TIMESMost of the abuse happened before 2002, and statutes of limitation kept nearly all of it out of court.
The probe by the numbers
- More than 300,000 pages of documents reviewed and more than 100 interviews (Axios)
- 3 cases referred to district attorneys; 1 led to charges (Guardian)
Trump says a diesel export ban is still on the table but shows less appetite for it
BLOOMBERGUpdateTrump said a ban could spike prices for other fuels, but he would not rule one out. He is now pushing red-dyed diesel to lower prices; that off-road fuel skips the federal highway diesel tax of about 24 cents a gallon.
How we got here
- Sep. 24 — Trump called for halting diesel exports; the White House denied plans for a 90-day ban, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright warned refineries would cut output, raising gasoline and jet fuel prices.
- Sep. 28 — Trump said he was "very seriously" considering a diesel export ban.
- Sep. 29 — The UK lobbied privately for an exemption; Goldman Sachs said a ban would cut diesel prices at first, then push gasoline up each week it lasted.
Ohio passes a gas-tax holiday, joining about a third of states cutting fuel taxes
ABC NEWSUpdateIran warOhio passed a gas-tax holiday and will replace the lost road money with $725 million from its general fund. Regular gas averages $4.43 a gallon, up about 50% since the Iran war began (AAA, via ABC News). Ohio joins about a third of states now offering some fuel-tax relief.
How we got here
- March — Georgia suspended its fuel tax, then extended the suspension into June.
- Sept. 28 — Greg Abbott (Gov-R Texas) declared a diesel disaster, letting farmers and loggers run tax-free dyed diesel on highways. Louisiana had declared a fuel emergency the week before.
- Sept. 29 — Brian Kemp (Gov-R Georgia) suspended the state's 33.3-cent gasoline and 37.3-cent diesel taxes again, for 30 days through Oct. 29.
The pump numbers
- Average US diesel: $6.41 a gallon, a few cents shy of last week's record (AAA).
- ABC reports Ohio's move was spurred by its race for governor.
Trump says South Korea will put about $54 billion into the Alaska LNG pipeline
CBS NEWSThe money is about 15% of the $350 billion South Korea pledged in its 2025 tariff deal, and timing and financing are still uncertain.
The project and the pitch
- The 807-mile pipeline would run from the North Slope to a southern Alaska export terminal; the build is projected at 3 years, with exports 2 years later if financing comes through.
- Korea's announced US energy investments also include a Texas gas plant and eight nuclear plants.
- Bloomberg calls it the second such Oval Office announcement this week in a battleground Senate state, after Iowa.
Second-quarter US GDP growth revised up to 2.2% annualized, from 1.5%
PBS NEWSHOURConsumer spending grew 3.8% annualized, up from 0.7% in the first quarter, and imports rose 12.6%, which cut nearly 1.7 points off growth.
The rest of the numbers
- Non-housing business investment grew 9% annualized, led by AI spending.
- The first third-quarter GDP estimate comes out Oct. 29.
DHS admits in court filings its voter-citizenship screening may have flagged US citizens as noncitizens
REASONDHS first told Nevada it had found 15,903 noncitizens on the state's voter rolls. After a manual review it cut that to a follow-up list of 185 names, and all 185 were later found to be US citizens.
What the filing says
- DHS said Monday, Sept. 28, that 'potential inaccuracies were identified' in its voter-screening lists.
- People it matches are added to TECS, a law enforcement watchlist.
- DHS did not say what happens to citizens already on that list.
Argument poll: 33% say entering Iran war was right, 55% wrong; Democrats lead by 9.4
THE ARGUMENT2026 midtermsDemocrats lead the generic ballot by 9.4 points among likely voters, vs. 5.6 points among registered voters.
Other toplines
- Trump net approval: -25 among registered voters, -26 among likely voters.
- Democrats lead on trust over foreign policy by 6 points, up from a 1-point deficit in May.
Pentagon changes overseas absentee voting forms, removing a category of citizens Republicans want barred from voting
NPRThe Pentagon changed the forms many Americans abroad use to vote absentee, and the new version drops U.S. citizens living overseas who have never lived in the U.S., NPR reports. Republicans have pushed to block that group from voting. Their eligibility comes from state law, not the federal form: about three dozen states plus D.C. let them vote absentee using a parent's U.S. address (NPR; Election Assistance Commission). The Pentagon's voting-assistance office says states can still process the old forms.
Elections22 races
The midterms · 33 days out · November 3, 2026
D or R take the House / Senate?
U.S. House: chance Democrats take it, Polymarket 93%, Kalshi 91%. U.S. Senate: chance Democrats take it, Polymarket 63%, Kalshi 63%. Full day-by-day figures are in the table below.
No House district is priced by either book — the House appears here as chamber control only
Each bar is one contract: will Democrats control this chamber after the 2026 midterms. The Republican share is the arithmetic complement of that price, not a separately traded market. Republicans hold the House and the Senate, so the figure printed there is the chance Democrats take them. Two venues price each contract; where they differ the lighter wedge is how far apart they are, and the panel on the right is the week.
- two venues, priced separately
- shaded = how far apart they are
- 50% — control flips here
- where it stood 7 days ago
- the last 7 days, on its own scale
- week panel: one line a party
The week panel draws one line per party, crossing where control does. Only the Democratic line is a traded price: the Republicanline is its arithmetic complement, the same mirror the bar’s other half is, and not a second market agreeing with the first. The shading around each line is how far apart the two venues are.
Market prices are not forecasts with error bars; they are the last price two sets of traders agreed on. The gap between the venues is the closest thing here to a stated uncertainty. The bar runs 0–100%; the week panel beside it is zoomed to its own data and prints its top and bottom, because a two-point move is four pixels wide on a 0–100% scale and was previously drawn there anyway.
The two chambers are not the same kind of bet. The House sits far enough from the flip line that the venues’ disagreement barely matters; the Senate sits close enough that their 1.0pp gap / 0.0pp gap is a meaningful share of the distance to 50%.
Who is defending the House and the Senate is sourced, not remembered — House, 2026-07-23 issue: the NDAA passed “216-212, with six Democrats joining a unified Republican majority.”; Senate, 2026-08-10 issue: “Republicans hold 53 of the Senate's 100 seats.”
Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
| Day | U.S. House · Polymarket | U.S. House · Kalshi | U.S. Senate · Polymarket | U.S. Senate · Kalshi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days ago | 93% | 92% | 63% | 65% |
| 6 days ago | 93% | 91% | 63% | 61% |
| 5 days ago | 93% | 92% | 63% | 62% |
| 4 days ago | 93% | 92% | 63% | 62% |
| 3 days ago | 93% | 92% | 63% | 62% |
| 2 days ago | 93% | 91% | 63% | 62% |
| yesterday | 93% | 92% | 63% | 62% |
| today | 93% | 91% | 63% | 63% |
3 closest races
yGeorgia governorJackson vs. BottomsBottoms51.5%Jackson52.5%books split
POLYMARKET: Georgia governor — general election
Rick Jackson (R) faces Keisha Lance Bottoms (D).
Georgia's governor's office is open, and the only race here where the two venues do not agree on who is ahead.
The books name different leaders
Georgia governor
Each line is one book’s lead — the gap between the two candidates, signed. Zero is a tie, and the two venues are on opposite sides of it.
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 4.0ppGeorgia governor. Lead in percentage points, positive to Rick Jackson. Kalshi: Jackson ahead by 4 points. Polymarket: Bottoms ahead by 3 points. Every day is in the table below.
today
- Jackson+4%Kalshi
- Bottoms+3%Polymarket
- Jackson48.5%Polymarket
- Jackson52.5%Kalshi
- Bottoms51.5%Polymarket
- Bottoms48.5%Kalshi
Market-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. The lead is the gap between the two, in points. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
The lead is one candidate’s price minus the other’s, at the same venue on the same day — never one book’s Tuesday against the other’s Thursday. It is drawn only where a venue priced both candidates, so a line starts late rather than being stretched across days it was never quoted over.
A day inside a tenth of a point is printed as levelrather than being rounded onto somebody’s side: on a chart whose whole subject is who is in front, a dead heat shown as a win is the one error that cannot be recovered from the drawing.
The markets: Rick Jackson Polymarket, Kalshi · Keisha Lance Bottoms Polymarket, Kalshi
Every price behind the chart, and the lead it produces. Georgia governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Jackson · Polymarket Bottoms · Polymarket Lead · Polymarket Jackson · Kalshi Bottoms · Kalshi Lead · Kalshi 7 days ago 45.5% 54.5% Bottoms +9% 47.0% 54.0% Bottoms +7% 6 days ago 45.5% 54.5% Bottoms +9% 48.0% 53.0% Bottoms +5% 5 days ago 45.5% 51.5% Bottoms +6% 49.0% 53.0% Bottoms +4% 4 days ago 47.5% 52.5% Bottoms +5% 50.0% 51.0% Bottoms +1% 3 days ago 47.5% 52.5% Bottoms +5% 50.0% 51.0% Bottoms +1% 2 days ago 48.5% 52.5% Bottoms +4% 52.0% 51.0% Jackson +1% yesterday 48.5% 51.5% Bottoms +3% 52.0% 49.0% Jackson +3% today 48.5% 51.5% Bottoms +3% 52.5% 48.5% Jackson +4% zNevada governor
POLYMARKET: Nevada governor — general election
Joe Lombardo (R) faces Aaron Ford (D).
Nevada's Republican governor is defending his job, and the Republican side holds a narrow lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Nevada governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Nevada governor. Joe Lombardo (R): Polymarket 51.5%, Kalshi 53.5%; Aaron Ford (D): Polymarket 48.5%, Kalshi 46.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Joe Lombardo 53% · Aaron Ford 46%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Joe Lombardo (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$118K50.5%Kalshi322K contracts · 53%/54%53.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+1.0ppAaron Ford (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$61.0K48.5%Kalshi571K contracts · 45%/47%47.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Nevada governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Joe Lombardo · Polymarket Joe Lombardo · Kalshi Aaron Ford · Polymarket Aaron Ford · Kalshi 7 days ago 50.5% 53.0% 48.5% 47% 6 days ago 50.5% 53.0% 49.0% 47% 5 days ago 50.5% 53.0% 49.5% 47% 4 days ago 51.5% 54.0% 47.5% 46% 3 days ago 52.5% 53.0% 47.5% 47% 2 days ago 51.5% 54.0% 48.5% 46% yesterday 51.5% 52.0% 48.5% 47% today 51.5% 53.5% 48.5% 46% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
rMaine Senate
POLYMARKET: Maine Senate — general election
Troy Jackson (D) faces Susan Collins (R).
Democrats only got a candidate here after their primary winner withdrew, and the Democratic side holds a clear lead, but no race here has moved more this week: it is down about twelve points.
Two markets, one question
Maine Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Maine Senate. Troy Jackson (D): Polymarket 58.5%, Kalshi 58.5%; Susan Collins (R): Polymarket 40.5%, Kalshi 41.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Troy Jackson 59% · Susan Collins 41%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Troy Jackson (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$1.2M66.5%Kalshi3.4M contracts · 58%/59%74.0%venue gap7.5pp7-day move-8.0ppSusan Collins (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$863K33.5%Kalshi3.7M contracts · 41%/42%28.0%venue gap5.5pp7-day move+7.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Maine Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Troy Jackson · Polymarket Troy Jackson · Kalshi Susan Collins · Polymarket Susan Collins · Kalshi 7 days ago 66.5% 74.0% 33.5% 28.0% 6 days ago 64.5% 65.0% 34.5% 35.0% 5 days ago 60.5% 63.0% 40.5% 37.0% 4 days ago 60.5% 61.0% 38.5% 40.0% 3 days ago 59.5% 60.0% 40.5% 41.0% 2 days ago 58.5% 60.0% 40.5% 41.0% yesterday 58.5% 60.0% 40.5% 40.0% today 58.5% 58.5% 40.5% 41.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
The other 19 races
Senate9 of 10
tAlaska Senate
POLYMARKET: Alaska Senate — general election
Mary Peltola (D) faces Dan Sullivan (R).
A sitting Republican senator is defending this seat, and Peltola holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Alaska Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Alaska Senate. Mary Peltola (D): Polymarket 72.5%, Kalshi 71.5%; Dan Sullivan (R): Polymarket 28.5%, Kalshi 29.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Mary Peltola 72% · Dan Sullivan 29%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Mary Peltola (D)7 days agoPolymarket$671K72.5%Kalshi171K contracts · 71%/72%76.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move0.0ppDan Sullivan (R)7 days agoPolymarket$316K28.5%Kalshi147K contracts · 28%/30%26.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Alaska Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Mary Peltola · Polymarket Mary Peltola · Kalshi Dan Sullivan · Polymarket Dan Sullivan · Kalshi 7 days ago 72.5% 76.0% 28.5% 26% 6 days ago 72.5% 74.0% 28.5% 28% 5 days ago 72.5% 74.0% 28.5% 27% 4 days ago 72.5% 73.0% 29.5% 28% 3 days ago 72.5% 73.0% 28.5% 27% 2 days ago 72.5% 73.0% 28.5% 27% yesterday 72.5% 73.0% 28.5% 28% today 72.5% 71.5% 28.5% 29% abGeorgia Senate
POLYMARKET: Georgia Senate — general election
Jon Ossoff (D) faces Mike Collins (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Georgia Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 0.3pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Georgia Senate. Jon Ossoff (D): Polymarket 95.50%, Kalshi 95.25%; Mike Collins (R): Polymarket 5.00%, Kalshi 4.75%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.3pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Jon Ossoff 95% · Mike Collins 4.8%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Jon Ossoff (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$85.7K94.5%Kalshi431K contracts · 95%/96%94.2%venue gap0.3pp7-day move+1.0ppMike Collins (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$110K5.4%Kalshi1.0M contracts · 4.5%/5.0%5.4%venue gap0.0pp7-day move-0.4ppEvery sample behind the chart. Georgia Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Jon Ossoff · Polymarket Jon Ossoff · Kalshi Mike Collins · Polymarket Mike Collins · Kalshi 7 days ago 94.5% 94.20% 5.40% 5.40% 6 days ago 95.5% 94.40% 4.10% 6.50% 5 days ago 95.5% 94.90% 3.95% 6.20% 4 days ago 95.5% 94.50% 4.05% 5.90% 3 days ago 95.5% 94.10% 4.00% 5.70% 2 days ago 95.5% 94.80% 3.95% 4.20% yesterday 95.5% 95.80% 5.00% 4.60% today 95.5% 95.25% 5.00% 4.75% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
uIowa Senate
POLYMARKET: Iowa Senate — general election
Ashley Hinson (R) faces Josh Turek (D).
An open seat, with no incumbent running, and the Republican side holds a clear lead.
Two markets, one question
Iowa Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Iowa Senate. Ashley Hinson (R): Polymarket 58.5%, Kalshi 59.5%; Josh Turek (D): Polymarket 41.5%, Kalshi 41.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Ashley Hinson 59% · Josh Turek 42%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Ashley Hinson (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$313K56.5%Kalshi1.5M contracts · 59%/60%55.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move+2.0ppJosh Turek (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$341K44%Kalshi2.0M contracts · 41%/42%46%venue gap2.0pp7-day move-2.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Iowa Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Ashley Hinson · Polymarket Ashley Hinson · Kalshi Josh Turek · Polymarket Josh Turek · Kalshi 7 days ago 56.5% 55.0% 44.0% 46.0% 6 days ago 58.5% 57.0% 41.5% 44.0% 5 days ago 58.5% 57.0% 41.5% 45.0% 4 days ago 57.5% 57.0% 41.5% 44.0% 3 days ago 58.5% 58.0% 41.5% 43.0% 2 days ago 58.5% 59.0% 41.5% 41.0% yesterday 58.5% 60.0% 41.5% 42.0% today 58.5% 59.5% 41.5% 41.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
vMichigan Senate
POLYMARKET: Michigan Senate — general election
Abdul El-Sayed (D) faces Mike Rogers (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Michigan Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Michigan Senate. Abdul El-Sayed (D): Polymarket 72.5%, Kalshi 73.5%; Mike Rogers (R): Polymarket 27.5%, Kalshi 27.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Abdul El-Sayed 73% · Mike Rogers 28%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Abdul El-Sayed (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$680K71.5%Kalshi2.0M contracts · 73%/74%74.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+1.0ppMike Rogers (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$532K28.5%Kalshi2.7M contracts · 27%/28%26.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Michigan Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Abdul El-Sayed · Polymarket Abdul El-Sayed · Kalshi Mike Rogers · Polymarket Mike Rogers · Kalshi 7 days ago 71.5% 74.0% 28.5% 26.0% 6 days ago 70.5% 74.0% 29.5% 28.0% 5 days ago 70.5% 73.0% 29.5% 28.0% 4 days ago 70.5% 72.0% 30.5% 29.0% 3 days ago 72.5% 72.0% 28.5% 29.0% 2 days ago 72.5% 72.0% 27.5% 29.0% yesterday 72.5% 74.0% 27.5% 27.0% today 72.5% 73.5% 27.5% 27.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
acNebraska Senate
POLYMARKET: Nebraska Senate — general election
Pete Ricketts (R) faces Dan Osborn (I).
The Republican side holds a commanding lead after gaining about three points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Nebraska Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Nebraska Senate. Pete Ricketts (R): Polymarket 70.5%, Kalshi 72.5%; Dan Osborn (I): Polymarket 30.5%, Kalshi 28.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Pete Ricketts 72% · Dan Osborn 28%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Pete Ricketts (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$246K69.5%Kalshi1.2M contracts · 72%/73%67.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+1.0ppDan Osborn (I)7 days agoPolymarket$114K30.5%Kalshi797K contracts · 27%/29%35.0%venue gap4.5pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Nebraska Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Pete Ricketts · Polymarket Pete Ricketts · Kalshi Dan Osborn · Polymarket Dan Osborn · Kalshi 7 days ago 69.5% 67.0% 30.5% 35% 6 days ago 69.5% 73.0% 30.5% 29% 5 days ago 69.5% 71.0% 30.5% 31% 4 days ago 69.5% 70.0% 30.5% 30% 3 days ago 69.5% 70.0% 30.5% 29% 2 days ago 70.5% 71.0% 30.5% 28% yesterday 70.5% 73.0% 30.5% 27% today 70.5% 72.5% 30.5% 28% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
adNew Hampshire Senate
POLYMARKET: New Hampshire Senate — general election
Chris Pappas (D) faces John E. Sununu (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
New Hampshire Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
New Hampshire Senate. Chris Pappas (D): Polymarket 85.5%, Kalshi 86.5%; John E. Sununu (R): Polymarket 13.5%, Kalshi 14.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Chris Pappas 86% · John E. Sununu 14%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Chris Pappas (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$141K85.5%Kalshi448K contracts · 86%/87%85.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move0.0ppJohn E. Sununu (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$148K14.5%Kalshi1.1M contracts · 14%/15%16.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. New Hampshire Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Chris Pappas · Polymarket Chris Pappas · Kalshi John E. Sununu · Polymarket John E. Sununu · Kalshi 7 days ago 85.5% 85.0% 14.5% 16.0% 6 days ago 86.5% 86.0% 14.0% 15.0% 5 days ago 85.0% 85.0% 13.5% 14.0% 4 days ago 86.5% 86.0% 14.5% 15.0% 3 days ago 86.5% 85.0% 12.5% 15.0% 2 days ago 85.5% 86.0% 13.5% 15.0% yesterday 85.5% 87.0% 13.5% 14.0% today 85.5% 86.5% 13.5% 14.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
aaNorth Carolina Senate
POLYMARKET: North Carolina Senate — general election
Roy Cooper (D) faces Michael Whatley (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
North Carolina Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
North Carolina Senate. Roy Cooper (D): Polymarket 95.50%, Kalshi 94.35%; Michael Whatley (R): Polymarket 4.5%, Kalshi 6.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Roy Cooper 94% · Michael Whatley 5.9%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Roy Cooper (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$104K94.5%Kalshi1.4M contracts · 94%/95%93.5%venue gap1.0pp7-day move+1.0ppMichael Whatley (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$107K6.5%Kalshi995K contracts · 5.5%/6.5%6.5%venue gap0.0pp7-day move-2.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. North Carolina Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Roy Cooper · Polymarket Roy Cooper · Kalshi Michael Whatley · Polymarket Michael Whatley · Kalshi 7 days ago 94.5% 93.50% 6.5% 6.5% 6 days ago 95.5% 93.30% 5.5% 6.9% 5 days ago 95.5% 93.60% 5.5% 6.2% 4 days ago 95.5% 93.60% 5.5% 6.5% 3 days ago 95.5% 93.60% 5.5% 6.7% 2 days ago 95.5% 94.30% 4.5% 5.8% yesterday 95.5% 94.60% 4.5% 6.0% today 95.5% 94.35% 4.5% 6.0% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
wOhio Senate
POLYMARKET: Ohio Senate — general election
Sherrod Brown (D) faces Jon Husted (R).
A special election, to serve out the rest of someone else's Senate term, and the Democratic side holds a clear lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Ohio Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Ohio Senate. Sherrod Brown (D): Polymarket 59.5%, Kalshi 59.5%; Jon Husted (R): Polymarket 39.5%, Kalshi 40.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Sherrod Brown 60% · Jon Husted 40%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Sherrod Brown (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$513K57.5%Kalshi2.6M contracts · 59%/60%60.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+2.0ppJon Husted (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$334K41.5%Kalshi2.5M contracts · 40%/41%40.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-2.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Ohio Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Sherrod Brown · Polymarket Sherrod Brown · Kalshi Jon Husted · Polymarket Jon Husted · Kalshi 7 days ago 57.5% 60.0% 41.5% 40.0% 6 days ago 57.5% 59.0% 41.5% 40.0% 5 days ago 57.5% 59.0% 41.5% 42.0% 4 days ago 57.5% 59.0% 42.5% 42.0% 3 days ago 62.0% 58.0% 37.5% 42.0% 2 days ago 59.5% 59.0% 39.5% 43.0% yesterday 59.5% 61.0% 39.5% 41.0% today 59.5% 59.5% 39.5% 40.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
sTexas Senate
POLYMARKET: Texas Senate — general election
James Talarico (D) faces Ken Paxton (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead after the Republican side lost about four points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Texas Senate
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 3.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Texas Senate. James Talarico (D): Polymarket 64.5%, Kalshi 61.5%; Ken Paxton (R): Polymarket 36.5%, Kalshi 38.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 3.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: James Talarico 62% · Ken Paxton 38%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
James Talarico (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$760K61.5%Kalshi6.5M contracts · 61%/62%59.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+3.0ppKen Paxton (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$861K39.5%Kalshi9.3M contracts · 38%/39%43.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move-3.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Texas Senate, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day James Talarico · Polymarket James Talarico · Kalshi Ken Paxton · Polymarket Ken Paxton · Kalshi 7 days ago 61.5% 59.0% 39.5% 43.0% 6 days ago 60.5% 59.0% 39.5% 43.0% 5 days ago 60.5% 62.0% 39.5% 40.0% 4 days ago 60.5% 60.0% 39.5% 40.0% 3 days ago 61.5% 60.0% 39.5% 41.0% 2 days ago 64.5% 60.0% 35.5% 41.0% yesterday 64.5% 59.0% 36.5% 41.0% today 64.5% 61.5% 36.5% 38.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
Governors10 of 12
afAlaska governor
POLYMARKET: Alaska governor — general election
Bernadette Wilson (R) faces Tom Begich (D).
Wilson holds a clear lead.
Two markets, one question
Alaska governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Alaska governor. Bernadette Wilson (R): Polymarket 19.5%, Kalshi 17.5%; Tom Begich (D): Polymarket 1.05%, Kalshi 0.80%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Series run 6–8 samples because the venues listed these markets on different days; a short line starts late rather than being stretched across a week it was never priced over.
Money-weighted: Bernadette Wilson 19% · Tom Begich 0.9%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Bernadette Wilson (R)7 days agoPolymarket$184K19.5%Kalshi57.0K contracts · 16%/19%—venue gap—7-day move0.0ppTom Begich (D)7 days agoPolymarket$166K1.3%Kalshi246K contracts · 0.6%/1.0%0.4%venue gap0.9pp7-day move-0.2ppEvery sample behind the chart. Alaska governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Bernadette Wilson · Polymarket Bernadette Wilson · Kalshi Tom Begich · Polymarket Tom Begich · Kalshi 7 days ago 19.5% — 1.30% 0.4% 6 days ago 19.5% — 1.30% 0.3% 5 days ago 19.5% 16.0% 1.30% 0.6% 4 days ago 19.5% 17.0% 1.25% 0.3% 3 days ago 19.5% 18.0% 1.25% 1.0% 2 days ago 19.5% 17.0% 1.05% 0.9% yesterday 19.5% 19.0% 1.05% 0.6% today 19.5% 17.5% 1.05% 0.8% ahArizona governor
POLYMARKET: Arizona governor — general election
Katie Hobbs (D) faces Andy Biggs (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Arizona governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Arizona governor. Katie Hobbs (D): Polymarket 88.5%, Kalshi 87.5%; Andy Biggs (R): Polymarket 10.5%, Kalshi 11.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Katie Hobbs 88% · Andy Biggs 11%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Katie Hobbs (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$42.5K88.5%Kalshi345K contracts · 87%/88%90.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move0.0ppAndy Biggs (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$46.7K10.5%Kalshi277K contracts · 11%/12%12.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Arizona governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Katie Hobbs · Polymarket Katie Hobbs · Kalshi Andy Biggs · Polymarket Andy Biggs · Kalshi 7 days ago 88.5% 90.0% 10.5% 12.0% 6 days ago 88.5% 90.0% 10.5% 13.0% 5 days ago 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 13.0% 4 days ago 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 13.0% 3 days ago 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 13.0% 2 days ago 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 13.0% yesterday 88.5% 88.0% 10.5% 13.0% today 88.5% 87.5% 10.5% 11.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
alFlorida governor
POLYMARKET: Florida governor — general election
Byron Donalds (R) faces David Jolly (D).
Florida's governor's office is open, and the Republican side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Florida governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Florida governor. Byron Donalds (R): Polymarket 78.5%, Kalshi 77.5%; David Jolly (D): Polymarket 21.5%, Kalshi 23.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Byron Donalds 78% · David Jolly 23%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Byron Donalds (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$113K77.5%Kalshi1.6M contracts · 77%/78%74.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move+1.0ppDavid Jolly (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$125K21.5%Kalshi719K contracts · 23%/24%27.0%venue gap5.5pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Florida governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Byron Donalds · Polymarket Byron Donalds · Kalshi David Jolly · Polymarket David Jolly · Kalshi 7 days ago 77.5% 74.0% 21.5% 27.0% 6 days ago 78.0% 79.0% 21.5% 22.0% 5 days ago 79.5% 79.0% 21.5% 23.0% 4 days ago 78.5% 78.0% 21.5% 23.0% 3 days ago 79.0% 79.0% 21.5% 22.0% 2 days ago 78.5% 78.0% 21.5% 24.0% yesterday 78.5% 78.0% 21.5% 23.0% today 78.5% 77.5% 21.5% 23.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
aeIowa governor
POLYMARKET: Iowa governor — general election
Rob Sand (D) faces Zach Lahn (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Iowa governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Iowa governor. Rob Sand (D): Polymarket 83.5%, Kalshi 83.5%; Zach Lahn (R): Polymarket 14.5%, Kalshi 16.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Rob Sand 84% · Zach Lahn 16%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Rob Sand (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$55.3K83.5%Kalshi409K contracts · 83%/84%83.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move0.0ppZach Lahn (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$55.0K15.5%Kalshi404K contracts · 16%/17%18.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Iowa governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Rob Sand · Polymarket Rob Sand · Kalshi Zach Lahn · Polymarket Zach Lahn · Kalshi 7 days ago 83.5% 83.0% 15.5% 18.0% 6 days ago 83.5% 83.0% 15.5% 18.0% 5 days ago 88.0% 83.0% 11.0% 16.0% 4 days ago 87.5% 84.0% 13.5% 18.0% 3 days ago 82.5% 85.0% 15.5% 16.0% 2 days ago 83.5% 84.0% 14.5% 17.0% yesterday 83.5% 85.0% 14.5% 17.0% today 83.5% 83.5% 14.5% 16.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
agMichigan governor
POLYMARKET: Michigan governor — general election
Jocelyn Benson (D) faces John James (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Michigan governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 0.8pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Michigan governor. Jocelyn Benson (D): Polymarket 91.50%, Kalshi 92.25%; John James (R): Polymarket 8.50%, Kalshi 8.85%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.8pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Jocelyn Benson 92% · John James 8.7%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Jocelyn Benson (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$51.2K92.5%Kalshi78.9K contracts · 92%/93%92.7%venue gap0.2pp7-day move-1.0ppJohn James (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$159K6.5%Kalshi159K contracts · 7.7%/10%8.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move+2.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Michigan governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Jocelyn Benson · Polymarket Jocelyn Benson · Kalshi John James · Polymarket John James · Kalshi 7 days ago 92.5% 92.70% 6.5% 8.00% 6 days ago 92.5% 92.00% 6.5% 8.90% 5 days ago 92.5% 92.10% 6.5% 7.70% 4 days ago 92.5% 92.90% 6.5% 7.90% 3 days ago 92.5% 91.90% 6.5% 8.00% 2 days ago 91.5% 91.70% 8.5% 8.70% yesterday 91.5% 91.80% 8.5% 8.70% today 91.5% 92.25% 8.5% 8.85% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
ajNew York governor
POLYMARKET: New York governor — general election
Kathy Hochul (D) faces Bruce Blakeman (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
New York governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.1pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
New York governor. Kathy Hochul (D): Polymarket 95.5%, Kalshi 94.7%; Bruce Blakeman (R): Polymarket 4.5%, Kalshi 5.6%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.1pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Kathy Hochul 95% · Bruce Blakeman 5.5%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Kathy Hochul (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$55.4K95.0%Kalshi415K contracts · 95%/95%94.2%venue gap0.8pp7-day move+0.5ppBruce Blakeman (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$72.0K4.5%Kalshi1.3M contracts · 5.4%/5.8%6.3%venue gap1.8pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. New York governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Kathy Hochul · Polymarket Kathy Hochul · Kalshi Bruce Blakeman · Polymarket Bruce Blakeman · Kalshi 7 days ago 95.0% 94.2% 4.5% 6.3% 6 days ago 95.5% 94.5% 4.5% 5.7% 5 days ago 95.5% 94.6% 4.5% 6.1% 4 days ago 95.5% 94.0% 4.5% 6.1% 3 days ago 95.5% 94.7% 4.5% 6.1% 2 days ago 95.5% 94.8% 4.5% 5.9% yesterday 95.5% 94.5% 4.5% 5.6% today 95.5% 94.7% 4.5% 5.6% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
qOhio governor
POLYMARKET: Ohio governor — general election
Amy Acton (D) faces Vivek Ramaswamy (R).
Ohio is choosing a new governor, and the Democratic side holds a clear lead.
Two markets, one question
Ohio governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Ohio governor. Amy Acton (D): Polymarket 60.5%, Kalshi 60.5%; Vivek Ramaswamy (R): Polymarket 39.5%, Kalshi 40.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Amy Acton 61% · Vivek Ramaswamy 40%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Amy Acton (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$124K63.5%Kalshi857K contracts · 60%/61%62.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-3.0ppVivek Ramaswamy (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$134K35.5%Kalshi1.0M contracts · 40%/41%40.0%venue gap4.5pp7-day move+4.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Ohio governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Amy Acton · Polymarket Amy Acton · Kalshi Vivek Ramaswamy · Polymarket Vivek Ramaswamy · Kalshi 7 days ago 63.5% 62.0% 35.5% 40.0% 6 days ago 63.5% 60.0% 36.5% 40.0% 5 days ago 62.5% 61.0% 36.5% 39.0% 4 days ago 61.5% 62.0% 40.0% 39.0% 3 days ago 60.5% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% 2 days ago 60.5% 61.0% 39.5% 41.0% yesterday 60.5% 61.0% 39.5% 40.0% today 60.5% 60.5% 39.5% 40.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
akPennsylvania governor
POLYMARKET: Pennsylvania governor — general election
Josh Shapiro (D) faces Stacy Garrity (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Pennsylvania governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 0.7pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Pennsylvania governor. Josh Shapiro (D): Polymarket 96.90%, Kalshi 97.35%; Stacy Garrity (R): Polymarket 2.65%, Kalshi 3.35%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.7pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Series run 7–8 samples because the venues listed these markets on different days; a short line starts late rather than being stretched across a week it was never priced over.
Money-weighted: Josh Shapiro 97% · Stacy Garrity 3.3%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Josh Shapiro (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$7.5K97%Kalshi105K contracts · 97%/97%—venue gap—7-day move-0.1ppStacy Garrity (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$42.4K2.6%Kalshi410K contracts · 2.7%/4.0%2.8%venue gap0.2pp7-day move+0.1ppEvery sample behind the chart. Pennsylvania governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Josh Shapiro · Polymarket Josh Shapiro · Kalshi Stacy Garrity · Polymarket Stacy Garrity · Kalshi 7 days ago 97.00% — 2.60% 2.80% 6 days ago 97.20% 97.20% 2.65% 2.90% 5 days ago 97.05% 97.50% 2.65% 2.80% 4 days ago 96.90% 97.70% 2.65% 2.60% 3 days ago 96.90% 97.40% 2.65% 2.80% 2 days ago 96.95% 97.70% 2.65% 2.70% yesterday 97.00% 97.70% 2.65% 4.90% today 96.90% 97.35% 2.65% 3.35% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
aiTexas governor
POLYMARKET: Texas governor — general election
Greg Abbott (R) faces Gina Hinojosa (D).
The Republican side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Texas governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 3.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Texas governor. Greg Abbott (R): Polymarket 78.55%, Kalshi 77.50%; Gina Hinojosa (D): Polymarket 20.5%, Kalshi 23.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 3.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Greg Abbott 78% · Gina Hinojosa 23%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Greg Abbott (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$172K79.25%Kalshi364K contracts · 77%/78%75.00%venue gap4.2pp7-day move-0.7ppGina Hinojosa (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$152K21.5%Kalshi1.0M contracts · 23%/24%26.0%venue gap4.5pp7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Texas governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day Greg Abbott · Polymarket Greg Abbott · Kalshi Gina Hinojosa · Polymarket Gina Hinojosa · Kalshi 7 days ago 79.25% 75.0% 21.5% 26.0% 6 days ago 79.45% 76.0% 21.5% 25.0% 5 days ago 83.50% 79.0% 17.0% 22.0% 4 days ago 84.15% 79.0% 15.5% 23.0% 3 days ago 81.05% 80.0% 19.5% 22.0% 2 days ago 78.85% 80.0% 20.5% 20.0% yesterday 78.55% 79.0% 20.5% 23.0% today 78.55% 77.5% 20.5% 23.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
xWisconsin governor
POLYMARKET: Wisconsin governor — general election
David Crowley (D) faces Tom Tiffany (R).
An open governorship, and the Democratic side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Wisconsin governor
Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Wisconsin governor. David Crowley (D): Polymarket 80.5%, Kalshi 81.5%; Tom Tiffany (R): Polymarket 19.5%, Kalshi 19.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: David Crowley 81% · Tom Tiffany 20%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
David Crowley (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$340K85.5%Kalshi486K contracts · 81%/82%84.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-5.0ppTom Tiffany (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$327K14.5%Kalshi780K contracts · 19%/20%16.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move+5.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Wisconsin governor, snapshot Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. Day David Crowley · Polymarket David Crowley · Kalshi Tom Tiffany · Polymarket Tom Tiffany · Kalshi 7 days ago 85.5% 84.0% 14.5% 16.0% 6 days ago 85.5% 84.0% 14.5% 17.0% 5 days ago 85.5% 83.0% 14.5% 18.0% 4 days ago 85.5% 84.0% 14.5% 17.0% 3 days ago 85.5% 84.0% 14.5% 17.0% 2 days ago 80.5% 82.0% 19.5% 17.0% yesterday 80.5% 84.0% 19.5% 17.0% today 80.5% 81.5% 19.5% 19.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
“Still in doubt” means no leader above 80% on either book. Prices captured Sep 30, 8:49 PM CT. These are trader-implied estimates, not polls. Separate contracts trade independently, so opposing prices may not add to exactly 100%.
Not news news1 story
Ongoing1 earlier update18 days
This story has run 2 times over 18 days, starting Sep 13.
- Five million Americans, including 1.5 million children, have lost SNAP benefits under the budget law
- Anti-hunger group counts 5.2 million people off SNAP since the 2025 law, as states start paying 75% of its admin costs Oct. 1 — this issue
SNAP enrollment is at its lowest since 2019, and the work requirement now reaches recipients up to age 64.
More SNAP (food stamp) changes from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the 2025 tax-and-spending law, take effect Thursday, Oct. 1.
The work rule. This part is not new; it has applied since the law was signed. Under it, Worth knowingApplying for jobs does not count toward the 80 hours, no matter how many applications you send. Only actual work or volunteering counts, as the woman in this story found when she lost benefits after applying to about 10 jobs a week..
The count. The Food Research & Action Center, an anti-hunger group, counts 5.2 million people who have lost SNAP since the law was signed on July 4, 2025. The White House says the changes keep the program going for future generations.
One recipient. Lori Covelli, 53, lost $760 a month in benefits. She had applied to about 10 jobs a week and got no offer.
“At this point, SNAP benefits are essentially over for me.”Lori Covelli, former SNAP recipient
What next. On Oct. 1, 2027, most states start paying 5% to 15% of benefit costs. Each state's share depends on its payment error rate (the share of benefits paid in the wrong amount). A farm bill draft from the Senate Agriculture Committee would push that start back by one year.
What the 2023 law's rise to age 54 did
- The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning research group, estimated about 750,000 adults aged 50 to 54 were newly at risk of losing benefits
- The Congressional Budget Office projected about 225,000 people would be cut in an average month
- A 2024 Census Bureau study of nine states found no measurable change in jobs or hours worked at the age cutoff
