Fauci takes the Fifth 111 times as Rand Paul prepares a contempt vote
Questions center on U.S.-funded research and Fauci’s categorical 2021 testimony—not evidence that he created COVID.
Fauci declined to answer every question at a Senate hearing on COVID-19’s origins and the government’s pandemic response. He said Paul’s repeated calls to prosecute him created a real risk that any answer could be used in a perjury case; Paul says Biden’s preemptive pardon removed that risk.
ContextClaims and evidence status: * [FALSE] “Fauci or NIH funded the creation of SARS-CoV-2.” The [NIH says](https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/statement-misinformation-about-sars-cov-2-origins) the bat viruses identified in the grant were genetically too distant from SARS-CoV-2 to have caused the pandemic. That does not settle whether a different virus escaped from a lab; it does refute the claim that this documented grant created COVID. * [NOT PROOF] “Taking the Fifth means Fauci is guilty.” Invoking the constitutional protection is not an admission. The live legal question is whether the pardon eliminated every plausible exposure, especially after Paul repeatedly accused Fauci of perjury. * [UNRESOLVED] “The diaries prove where COVID came from.” They show early scientific uncertainty, not the virus’s origin. U.S. intelligence agencies and scientists still disagree, often with low confidence. A committee contempt citation would still need action by the full Senate before it could become a criminal referral; the Justice Department would then decide whether to prosecute.
CBS NEWS21 sources