Political Guyentist
← Back to issue

A Justice Department lawyer says the Ivy League antisemitism cases were decided before anyone investigated

Political Guyentist · August 19, 20263 min read

THE HILL

A whistleblower complaint says investigators in some of the probes found no violations at all — and the schools paid anyway.

A former Justice Department lawyer has filed a whistleblower complaint about the department's antisemitism task force. It says the task force worked toward "predetermined" outcomes in its civil rights cases against Ivy League universities. In some of those cases, investigators found no violations of federal law at all. The schools were steered into settlements anyway, the complaint says. The Washington Post reported the same account, and said the task force pressured universities into punishing settlements even though it turned up little or no evidence of widespread abuse at the schools it examined. In the lawyer's telling, politics set where each case landed, not what investigators found.

What the task force collected from the schools that agreed to settleColumbia University: $200 million to the federal government over three years, plus $21 million to settle Equal Employment…3 details
  • Columbia University: $200 million to the federal government over three years, plus $21 million to settle Equal Employment Opportunity Commission claims, announced July 23, 2025.
  • Brown University: $50 million to Rhode Island workforce training groups over 10 years, agreed July 30, 2025.
  • University of Pennsylvania: no payment, but a July 2025 policy deal that unfroze about $175 million in federal money.

What we’re less sure of2 of 8 claims

Chosen

Columbia and Brown signed these agreements. One departing lawyer's complaint is not proof they were innocent. Nobody was charged with a crime. This is Title VI, the 1964 civil rights law that lets Washington cut off federal money to a school that discriminates. Settlements under it carry no admission of guilt. If investigators closed files finding nothing while the department kept demanding money, that is a scandal, and Columbia's $200 million should go back. But Columbia signed on July 23, 2025, and Brown a week later. Neither went to court. Harvard did, and won. They could have done the same.

Coerced

These were payments to get research funding released, and they fixed nothing on campus. Brown will pay $50 million over ten years to workforce training groups in Rhode Island. None of that reaches a Jewish student at Brown. The University of Pennsylvania paid nothing, got about $175 million unfrozen, and signed a deal about a transgender swimmer's eligibility under Title IX. Antisemitism was not in it. This rests on one former lawyer's account. Set it aside; the pressure is still there. The money at risk was research grants that pay for labs and teaching hospitals. Harvard had $2.2 billion frozen before a judge sided with it. Most schools cannot wait that out.

SEMI-RELATEDDOJ accuses William & Mary of discrimination in scholarships, benefits

Read more about: DOJ accuses William & Mary of discrimination in scholarships, benefits

The same DOJ civil rights division is opening the same kind of campus case the complaint says is decided before it starts.