News news6 stories
Ongoing7 earlier updates28 days
This story has run 8 times over 28 days, starting Jul 23.
- Trump Threatens to Bomb Iranian Bridges and Power Plants for Every Ship Hit in Strait of Hormuz
- Iran fires multiple ballistic missiles at U.S. base in Jordan; all are intercepted
- Iran denies Trump’s claim that new U.S. talks would start Monday
- Cargo ship is struck in the Strait of Hormuz
- Vance says the Iran talks are moving, then calls the war only half over
- Iran won't reopen Hormuz until the US unfreezes its assets and lifts the blockade
- Trump threatens to bomb Oman, the U.S. ally brokering the deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz
- Trump declares an "economic D-Day" on Iran as Hormuz traffic runs 85% below normal — this issue
Two days after the 60-day truce expired with no deal, Trump threatened any country whose banks, airports or companies help Tehran. Only 10 to 12 ships a day crossed the strait his blockade was meant to reopen.
President Trump announced a campaign to cut Iran off from the world economy. He threatened consequences for countries whose institutions or companies give Tehran money or trade. "This will be an ECONOMIC D-DAY, and we need all of our Allies to stand with the United States of America to isolate, and defeat, the Iran threat," he wrote. He added: "Oil smuggling, swap lines, cash transfers, exchange houses, ship registries, front companies — It all needs to stop NOW." The threat reaches past Iran itself. It covers any nation that lets its financial institutions, businesses, airports or government entities keep Tehran solvent. Trump also said the military position favors the United States, and that talks are still possible. Ship-tracking firm Kpler counted 12 crossings of the Strait of Hormuz on Monday and 10 on Tuesday, far below prewar levels.
BackgroundWhat the blockade has already taken out of Iran's economy
- Iranian crude loadings fell from 893,000 barrels a day in July to 156,000 through Aug. 17 — a drop of more than 80% in six weeks (Kpler).
- The Foundation for Defense of Democracies puts Iran's lost oil revenue at roughly $435 million a day since the blockade began Apr. 13.
- Iran's inflation is running near 65% by its own central bank's count. The rial fell to 1.9 million to the dollar in April.
- China buys more than 80% of the oil Iran still ships. Its small "teapot" refiners hold almost no US assets — and US assets are what a secondary sanction is supposed to seize.
Red take
Paper designations failed for four decades, and Chinese teapot refiners with no US assets can ignore another round of them — but the blockade is not paper. Iranian crude loadings fell from 893,000 barrels a day in July to 156,000 through Aug. 17, and a refiner immune to sanctions still cannot buy a cargo that never sails. Closing the exchange houses and ship registries that move the last 156,000 is what keeps that leverage from leaking away before Tehran has to trade for it.
Blue take
The crude drop is real leverage, and it is being spent on the one thing already tested and failed: threatening allied banks and ship registries, the 2018 playbook a 2024 Johns Hopkins study found strengthened Iran's state while impoverishing its people. The cost is not abstract. At 10 to 12 crossings a day, 85% below normal, the strait the blockade was meant to reopen is closed to everyone shipping through it, and every week of that is paid by importers who have no quarrel with Tehran.
Related reading
If Gulf producers permanently route around the strait, Iran loses the leverage the chokepoint gave it. A split Gulf export system becomes ordinary.
Read more about: JPMorgan says every extra month Hormuz stays shut adds $7 to $8 a barrel to Brent
Brent sat near $91.50 on Aug. 19. It had dipped to about $80 on Aug. 4, when a deal briefly looked possible. The price of the war shows up at American pumps.
Ongoing2 earlier updates3 days
This story has run 3 times over 3 days, starting Aug 17.
- Trump orders the Pentagon to cut U.S.–South Korea military drills, granting a demand North Korea has made for decades
- Trump cuts joint war drills with South Korea, blaming Seoul's refusal to help on Iran
- Trump cut the U.S.–South Korea war drills in half without telling Seoul first — this issue
Ulchi Freedom Shield goes from 11 days to five, ending Friday, Aug. 21 instead of Aug. 27, after Trump called the exercise insulting to Kim Jong Un.
The United States cut Exercise Ulchi Freedom Shield — the larger of the two combined war drills the U.S. and South Korea run every year to practice fighting the North — from 11 days to five, ending Friday, Aug. 21 instead of Thursday, Aug. 27. The live field training went with it: some events canceled, others moved onto computers. South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun said his government learned about it the same way the public did: "Neither our government nor U.S. officials knew what President Trump wrote on his Truth Social. We were not notified in advance." Trump said he has been in contact with Kim Jong Un and predicted the two would meet later this year. He also put a number on the North's arsenal: "He has 57 very powerful nuclear weapons. He's gonna be fine." Kim's sister, Kim Yo Jong, said she knew of no such contact and that Pyongyang was not interested either way. "The provocative, aggressive nature of the drills won't change even though their duration and size were reduced," she said.
What the six cut days were supposed to test
- Phase 2, the counterattack half set for Aug. 24–27, was cut outright. It is the only stretch where a South Korean four-star general commands the combined force — the one test of whether Seoul is ready to take wartime command of its own troops from a U.S. general.
- Fourteen field training events of battalion size or larger were planned around the drill, already down from 17 in 2025. Those are being sharply curtailed, with the details still under negotiation.
- About 18,000 South Korean troops were slated to take part, alongside some of the 28,500 U.S. personnel permanently stationed in the country.
Red take
Cutting Ulchi Freedom Shield from 11 days to five defers the wartime-command rehearsal a year; it does not move the 28,500 U.S. troops who actually hold the line, and next August restores it. The real cost is that Cho Hyun learned of it from a Truth Social post — an avoidable insult to an ally. That is a price worth paying once if it opens a channel to a man Trump says has "57 very powerful nuclear weapons," and worth nothing if the meeting never happens.
Blue take
The 11-day drill dropped to five deleted the half where a South Korean four-star leads — the only annual test of whether Seoul can take wartime command of its own troops — and Kim Yo Jong's answer was that she knew of no contact and Pyongyang was "not interested either way." A concession is cheap only if something comes back for it. Cho Hyun found out with the public, and allies who learn their defenses were traded on Truth Social start building deterrents they control.
Related reading
Read more about: North Korea told Washington in July 2025 that no amount of talking will end its nuclear program
Pyongyang's stated price for any Trump–Kim meeting is that the United States accept it as a nuclear-armed state — the exact outcome the drills exist to prevent.
Abu Dhabi halted trade, commerce and all financial transactions with Tehran on Tuesday, Aug. 18, after saying two Iranian ballistic missiles fell into the Persian Gulf; Iran denies firing them.
The United Arab Emirates halted trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran until further notice. The UAE said two ballistic missiles launched from Iran flew toward the country and fell into the Persian Gulf. Iran denied launching them. As of April the UAE accounted for 30.43% of Iran's imports and 12.5% of its exports — the biggest single hole either side of Iran's trade ledger. The rupture isolates Tehran beyond the direct loss of a customer. As NBC News put it, "Iran therefore depends heavily on the UAE, not because the UAE itself produces one-third of Iran's imports, but because it serves as a major gateway for Iran to access third-country goods and commercial infrastructure." TIME's assessment: "The impact on the Iranian economy could be significant."
What the halt cuts off besides cargo
- The UAE supplies roughly 22% of the about $23 billion in services — shipping, insurance, trade paperwork — that Iran buys abroad each year, the plumbing that makes the goods trade work.
- Total two-way trade has been running $16–28 billion a year, up from UAE exports to Iran of about $5.2 billion in 2018 (Iran International).
- Retired US Gen. Mark Kimmitt, a former assistant secretary of state, told Al Jazeera the UAE step is "even more significant than the embargo being put on by the United States."
Related reading
The embargo is Abu Dhabi's answer to Iran's campaign against shipping through the strait. There, the Islamabad transit agreement lapsed Monday, Aug. 17 with nothing replacing it, and Tehran is now demanding permits and tolls.
Read more about: Iran's supreme leader has installed a hardliner opposed to concessions atop the national security council
Economic pressure only works if someone in Tehran is looking for an exit, and the faction now running Iran's security apparatus is the one that argues against taking one.
Minutes from the July 28-29 meeting, released Wednesday, Aug. 19, say "many participants" thought a rate increase would be needed if inflation stays high.
The Federal Reserve left interest rates alone at its July 28-29 meeting, and the written account of that meeting, released Wednesday, Aug. 19, shows how many officials are close to voting for an increase. The Fed's rate-setting group, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), held its benchmark rate — the one that feeds mortgage, car-loan and credit-card rates — at 3.50-3.75 percent, down from a 2024 peak of 5.25-5.50 percent. The vote was 9-3, the fifth straight meeting with no change; the three dissenters wanted a quarter-point increase. The Fed publishes this account about three weeks after each meeting. This one showed mounting concern about inflation that has stayed above the Fed's 2 percent goal for more than five years — the Fed's preferred price gauge ran 3.7 percent in June, about 1.7 points above that goal. Multiple officials said an interest-rate increase could become necessary later this year, and many participants viewed a move as potentially warranted if inflation does not come down. Some officials said financial conditions may not be tight enough to slow prices at all. The Financial Times, reporting on the same account, wrote that "many members of the FOMC thought a rate increase would soon be warranted if inflation remains high." Most participants still expected inflation to decline on its own.
What the three dissenting votes broke
- Cleveland's Beth Hammack, Minneapolis's Neel Kashkari and Dallas's Lorie Logan all voted no the same way, for a quarter-point increase — the first three-way, same-direction dissent since September 2016.
- It is the largest dissent against a new Fed chair since Arthur Burns in 1970, per St. Louis Fed records, and Kevin Warsh, the new chair, has run only two meetings.
- Two more regional presidents who do not hold a vote this year, Kansas City's Jeff Schmid and St. Louis's Alberto Musalem, were reported to be in the same camp.
- Voting against the decision is rare in normal times: about 6 percent of all Fed votes since 1957.
- Warsh also floated cutting the Fed's meeting count from eight a year to six, which would mean fewer scheduled chances to move rates.
Red take
A quarter point costs borrowers real money now, and most participants still expect inflation to fall on its own — but that has been the forecast through more than five years above the Fed's 2 percent goal. Holding at 3.50-3.75 percent for a fifth straight meeting buys borrowers a discount today and charges wage earners for it in purchasing power they never get back.
Blue take
The minutes record a conditional — many participants thought a hike would be needed if inflation stays high — while most participants still expected inflation to decline on its own. Raising before that condition is met sends the bill straight to mortgage, car-loan and credit-card borrowers to insure a risk the committee's own forecast does not expect. The 9-3 hold makes borrowers wait for evidence rather than pay ahead of it.
Related reading
Read more about: Traders put September at roughly 69 percent no-change, with a hike as a 30 percent tail
Betting markets read the minutes as a warning rather than a decision: the first meeting where a hike is close to a coin flip is December, not September.
The duty covered roughly $20.2 billion of Canadian goods, and was set to start at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday, Aug. 19; the new deadline is Saturday, Aug. 22, and no signed text exists yet.
Trump paused a planned wave of 50% tariffs on Canadian goods — double the 25% he put on most Canadian goods in February 2025 — until the weekend as U.S. and Canadian negotiators, meeting for a third consecutive day, worked toward a final agreement. Trump said Canada had agreed to eliminate tariffs affecting American farmers, but he did not say which agricultural sectors were involved. The coverage of the deal, the concessions on each side, and the disputes still unresolved were not made public. "We feel confident that we've reached an agreement that will not only continue to protect American workers, American jobs, American supply chains, but really strengthen the North American economy," a U.S. official said. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was more guarded, describing substantial progress while saying important work remained. Canadian negotiators had said the two sides were stuck as recently as Monday, Aug. 17.
What the paused tariff would have taxed, and what it spared
- Hit: hockey equipment, wine, beer, milk, cheese, cement, plywood, clothing, furniture, electronics and industrial machinery — consumer goods, not raw inputs.
- Spared: energy, potash, fish and critical minerals, the categories U.S. refiners and farmers cannot easily replace.
- Legal vehicle: Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, a law that sat unused for its 96 years on the books. It lets a president tax a country's goods heavily when that country is found to discriminate against U.S. commerce.
- Unlike Trump's earlier Canada tariffs, this one would have taxed goods that the USMCA — the trade pact among the U.S Canada and Mexico — guarantees enter duty-free.
Red take
Two days after Canadian negotiators called the talks an impasse on Aug. 17, Ottawa agreed to drop tariffs hitting American farmers — movement no ordinary channel had produced. The threat was built on an untested statute and no signed text exists yet, which is a real cost carried by importers. But it was aimed at hockey equipment and furniture while sparing energy and potash, so the pressure landed where U.S. refiners would not pay it, and three more days to Aug. 22 is cheap.
Blue take
The impasse broke in two days, and sparing energy and potash aimed the duty away from U.S. refiners — that was deliberate. But a pause two hours out on roughly $20.2 billion of goods, with no signed text and no published list of what Canada got, means the farm concession cannot be priced against what was traded for it. Importers now hedge treaty risk on wine, furniture and machinery orders, and a deadline that moves to Aug. 22 moves again.
Related reading
Read more about: USMCA review opens with Canada seeking guarantees the pact still binds Washington
The three-country trade pact is up for its scheduled review this year, and Trump's use of a 1930 law to tax goods it protects is the precedent Canada and Mexico now have to negotiate against.
Treasury's Tuesday, Aug. 18 tally put gross debt at $40.047 trillion — $32.3 trillion of it owed to outside investors, $7.7 trillion owed by the government to itself.
Gross federal debt exceeded $40 trillion for the first time, reaching $40.047 trillion in the Treasury's Tuesday balance — less than five months after the total passed $39 trillion. Debt held by the public, the portion sold into bond markets to investors, foreign central banks and the Federal Reserve, stood at about $32.3 trillion. The remaining roughly $7.7 trillion is intragovernmental debt: IOUs between federal accounts, mostly what the Treasury owes the Social Security trust fund. The two figures behave differently. Public debt is the part that competes with private borrowers for savings and pushes on interest rates; the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget calls the gross number "less economically meaningful" as a share of GDP. "It took nearly 200 years for America's gross debt to reach $1 trillion for the first time in 1981," the group noted.
What the interest bill on that debt is crowding out
- Net interest hit $971 billion in fiscal 2025 — more than defense, more than Medicare, second only to Social Security.
- Interest eats 19 cents of every federal revenue dollar in 2026, up from 9 cents in 2021; CBO projects 26 cents by 2036.
- CBO's February 2026 baseline projects net interest reaching $2.1 trillion by 2036 — roughly double projected defense spending that year.
- Deficits are set to average 6.1% of GDP over the next decade against a 50-year average of 3.8%.
Red take
Strip out the $7.7 trillion the Treasury owes the Social Security trust fund and the case is unchanged: the $32.3 trillion held by the public is what competes for savings, and servicing it cost $971 billion in fiscal 2025 — more than defense, more than Medicare, and buying no benefit and no ship. At the pace that added a trillion in under five months, interest claims the budget before Congress funds a single thing it chose.
Blue take
The $971 billion interest bill is a real claim on the budget, and revenue alone will not close it — but it is owed on the $32.3 trillion held by the public, not on the $7.7 trillion the Treasury owes the Social Security trust fund. Counting those IOUs as debt to be cut takes benefits already earned from retirees and leaves the interest untouched, which is why CRFB calls the gross figure "less economically meaningful."
Related reading
Read more about: CBO: One Big Beautiful Bill Act adds $4.7 trillion to deficits, tariffs recover about $3 trillion
By CBO's count, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act adds $4.7 trillion to deficits. The tariff revenue meant to offset it, about $3 trillion, does not cover that.
Quick bites6
Treasury doubled planned bond buybacks to $4 billion and the 30-year yield fell to 5.18%
BLOOMBERGYields and the debtThe Treasury doubled its planned buybacks of longer-dated debt from $2 billion to $4 billion for September 9 through November 4, after the 30-year yield hit 5.34% on Tuesday, its highest in almost 20 years. The yield eased to 5.18% once the buybacks were announced. Analysts told BBC News that against the size of outstanding Treasury debt, an increase that size was unlikely to bring lasting relief.
Four states seek $200 billion from Meta over child-safety design
PBS NEWSHOURMeta teen settlementCalifornia, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey are the first of 29 states to go to trial, and they want damages plus changes to how Meta runs Facebook and Instagram. They say Meta built the apps to keep minors hooked even after it learned the mental-health risks. Former employee Arturo Béjar testified that the company put user growth ahead of child safety. Meta denies the claims and says it stands by its record of protecting minors.
Currently showing Largest corporate penalties in U.S. historyLargest corporate penalties in U.S. historyTrump picks White House aide Heidi Overton for FDA, and Cassidy is already balking
TIMERFK Jr.'s vaccine movesTrump named Dr. Heidi Overton, a health aide on his Domestic Policy Council, to run the Food and Drug Administration. Senate health committee chairman Bill Cassidy (Sen-R Louisiana) said her role in Trump's vaccine executive order was "almost disqualifying." Overton is a doctor with a Johns Hopkins degree in clinical investigation. She has backed splitting the MMR shot into three and tightening limits on the abortion pill mifepristone.
Appeals court keeps immigration agents away from 1,400 houses of worship in 33 states
STATELINEICE raidsA three-judge panel of the 4th Circuit upheld a lower-court order. It bars Homeland Security from immigration enforcement at or near the houses of worship in the case. That covers more than 1,400 congregations, and no others. They sued after DHS ended the "sensitive locations" policy in January 2025. The rule barred immigration arrests at churches, schools and hospitals. Four administrations kept it, starting with a 1993 memo.
A woman told the House Ethics Committee that Rep. Jimmy Gomez sexually assaulted her
A woman told the House Ethics Committee that Jimmy Gomez (Rep-D California) sexually assaulted her, her lawyers Lisa Banks and Sarah Nesbitt said. That statement is the only public account; the committee has made no finding, and Gomez has not publicly responded.
Judge blocks HHS teen-pregnancy grant changes but leaves 53 cancellations in place
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper temporarily blocked HHS from changing Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program grants while the lawsuit goes on. He found the challengers likely to win. The ruling does not restore the money HHS canceled at the end of June, when it killed 53 of the program's 67 grants two years early. Cooper said his power to order that money back remains unclear.
- 53 of 67 grants canceled at the end of June, two years early
Chart · pipeline render▲ label over mark · collapsed plotTeen Pregnancy Prevention Program grants after HHS cuts
Elections22 races
The midterms · 75 days out · November 3, 2026
D or R take the House / Senate?
U.S. House: chance Democrats take it, Polymarket 89%, Kalshi 85%. U.S. Senate: chance Democrats take it, Polymarket 51%, Kalshi 49%. Full day-by-day figures are in the table below.
No House district is priced by either book — the House appears here as chamber control only
Each bar is one contract: will Democrats control this chamber after the 2026 midterms. The Republican share is the arithmetic complement of that price, not a separately traded market. Republicans hold the House and the Senate, so the figure printed there is the chance Democrats take them. Two venues price each contract; where they differ the lighter wedge is how far apart they are, and the panel on the right is the week.
- two venues, priced separately
- shaded = how far apart they are
- 50% — control flips here
- where it stood 7 days ago
- the last 7 days, on its own scale
- week panel: one line a party
The week panel draws one line per party, crossing where control does. Only the Democratic line is a traded price: the Republicanline is its arithmetic complement, the same mirror the bar’s other half is, and not a second market agreeing with the first. The shading around each line is how far apart the two venues are.
Market prices are not forecasts with error bars; they are the last price two sets of traders agreed on. The gap between the venues is the closest thing here to a stated uncertainty. The bar runs 0–100%; the week panel beside it is zoomed to its own data and prints its top and bottom, because a two-point move is four pixels wide on a 0–100% scale and was previously drawn there anyway.
The two chambers are not the same kind of bet. The House sits far enough from the flip line that the venues’ disagreement barely matters; the Senate sits close enough that their 4.0pp gap / 2.0pp gap is a meaningful share of the distance to 50%.
Who is defending the House and the Senate is sourced, not remembered — House, 2026-07-23 issue: the NDAA passed “216-212, with six Democrats joining a unified Republican majority.”; Senate, 2026-08-10 issue: “Republicans hold 53 of the Senate's 100 seats.”
Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
| Day | U.S. House · Polymarket | U.S. House · Kalshi | U.S. Senate · Polymarket | U.S. Senate · Kalshi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days ago | 88% | 86% | 53% | 50% |
| 6 days ago | 88% | 86% | 53% | 48% |
| 5 days ago | 88% | 86% | 53% | 49% |
| 4 days ago | 88% | 86% | 51% | 48% |
| 3 days ago | 88% | 85% | 52% | 49% |
| 2 days ago | 88% | 86% | 51% | 48% |
| yesterday | 89% | 85% | 51% | 46% |
| today | 89% | 85% | 51% | 49% |
3 closest races
jTexas SenateTalarico vs. PaxtonTalarico51.5%Paxton50.5%books split
POLYMARKET: Texas Senate — general election
James Talarico (D) faces Ken Paxton (R).
The only race here where the two venues do not agree on who is ahead.
The books name different leaders
Texas Senate
Each line is one book’s lead — the gap between the two candidates, signed. Zero is a tie, and the two venues are on opposite sides of it.
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.0ppTexas Senate. Lead in percentage points, positive to James Talarico. Polymarket: Talarico ahead by 2 points. Kalshi: Paxton ahead by 1 point. Every day is in the table below.
today
- Talarico+2%Polymarket
- Paxton+1%Kalshi
- Talarico51.5%Polymarket
- Talarico49.5%Kalshi
- Paxton49.5%Polymarket
- Paxton50.5%Kalshi
Market-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. The lead is the gap between the two, in points. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
The lead is one candidate’s price minus the other’s, at the same venue on the same day — never one book’s Tuesday against the other’s Thursday. It is drawn only where a venue priced both candidates, so a line starts late rather than being stretched across days it was never quoted over.
A day inside a tenth of a point is printed as levelrather than being rounded onto somebody’s side: on a chart whose whole subject is who is in front, a dead heat shown as a win is the one error that cannot be recovered from the drawing.
The markets: James Talarico Polymarket, Kalshi · Ken Paxton Polymarket, Kalshi
Every price behind the chart, and the lead it produces. Texas Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Talarico · Polymarket Paxton · Polymarket Lead · Polymarket Talarico · Kalshi Paxton · Kalshi Lead · Kalshi 7 days ago 51.5% 49.5% Talarico +2% 51.0% 49.0% Talarico +2% 6 days ago 51.5% 49.5% Talarico +2% 50.0% 50.0% level 5 days ago 51.5% 49.5% Talarico +2% 51.0% 51.0% level 4 days ago 51.5% 48.5% Talarico +3% 49.0% 51.0% Paxton +2% 3 days ago 51.5% 48.5% Talarico +3% 49.0% 51.0% Paxton +2% 2 days ago 51.5% 49.5% Talarico +2% 50.0% 52.0% Paxton +2% yesterday 51.5% 49.5% Talarico +2% 50.0% 51.0% Paxton +1% today 51.5% 49.5% Talarico +2% 49.5% 50.5% Paxton +1% hOhio governor
POLYMARKET: Ohio governor — general election
Amy Acton (D) faces Vivek Ramaswamy (R).
Ohio is choosing a new governor, and it is a dead heat — the two sides are priced within two points of each other.
Two markets, one question
Ohio governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Ohio governor. Amy Acton (D): Polymarket 49.5%, Kalshi 50.5%; Vivek Ramaswamy (R): Polymarket 48.0%, Kalshi 48.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Amy Acton 50% · Vivek Ramaswamy 48%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Amy Acton (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$75.6K48.5%Kalshi412K contracts · 50%/51%50.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move+1.0ppVivek Ramaswamy (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$93.7K50.5%Kalshi635K contracts · 48%/49%49.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-2.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Ohio governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Amy Acton · Polymarket Amy Acton · Kalshi Vivek Ramaswamy · Polymarket Vivek Ramaswamy · Kalshi 7 days ago 48.5% 50.0% 50.5% 49.0% 6 days ago 48.5% 51.0% 50.5% 50.0% 5 days ago 48.0% 50.0% 48.5% 46.0% 4 days ago 48.0% 50.0% 49.5% 48.0% 3 days ago 47.5% 51.0% 48.5% 49.0% 2 days ago 48.0% 51.0% 48.5% 49.0% yesterday 49.5% 51.0% 48.0% 48.0% today 49.5% 50.5% 48.0% 48.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
mOhio Senate
POLYMARKET: Ohio Senate — general election
Sherrod Brown (D) faces Jon Husted (R).
A special election, to serve out the rest of someone else's Senate term, and the Democratic side holds a narrow lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Ohio Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Ohio Senate. Sherrod Brown (D): Polymarket 53.5%, Kalshi 51.5%; Jon Husted (R): Polymarket 47.5%, Kalshi 48.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Sherrod Brown 52% · Jon Husted 48%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Sherrod Brown (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$101K56.5%Kalshi778K contracts · 51%/52%51.0%venue gap5.5pp7-day move-3.0ppJon Husted (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$74.3K44.5%Kalshi1.4M contracts · 48%/49%49.0%venue gap4.5pp7-day move+3.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Ohio Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Sherrod Brown · Polymarket Sherrod Brown · Kalshi Jon Husted · Polymarket Jon Husted · Kalshi 7 days ago 56.5% 51.0% 44.5% 49.0% 6 days ago 57.5% 53.0% 42.5% 48.0% 5 days ago 52.5% 51.0% 47.0% 49.0% 4 days ago 52.5% 51.0% 46.5% 50.0% 3 days ago 52.5% 52.0% 47.5% 49.0% 2 days ago 52.5% 52.0% 47.5% 49.0% yesterday 53.5% 52.0% 47.5% 49.0% today 53.5% 51.5% 47.5% 48.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
The other 19 races
Senate8 of 10
gAlaska SenateAngie Nixon beats Alex Vindman for Florida's Democratic Senate nod, 750,000 votes to 550,000
THE GUARDIAN: Angie Nixon beats Alex Vindman for Florida's Democratic Senate nod, 750,000 votes to 550,000
Florida state Rep. Angie Nixon won the Democratic Senate nomination with more than 750,000 votes to Alex Vindman's roughly 550,000, despite raising about $975,000 against his $16.3 million. In Alaska's nonpartisan Senate primary the same night, Mary Peltola led the field at 48.0% with ballots still being counted.
- Nixon: ~$975,000 raised. Vindman: $16.3 million. A better than 10-to-1 edge that bought him second place.
Vindman outraised her more than 10 to one and still lost.
Two markets, one question
Alaska Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Alaska Senate. Mary Peltola (D): Polymarket 55.5%, Kalshi 56.5%; Dan Sullivan (R): Polymarket 44.0%, Kalshi 43.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Mary Peltola 56% · Dan Sullivan 44%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Mary Peltola (D)7 days agoPolymarket$220K51.5%Kalshi68.8K contracts · 56%/57%54.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+4.0ppDan Sullivan (R)7 days agoPolymarket$128K48.5%Kalshi67.2K contracts · 43%/44%45.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move-4.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Alaska Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Mary Peltola · Polymarket Mary Peltola · Kalshi Dan Sullivan · Polymarket Dan Sullivan · Kalshi 7 days ago 51.5% 54.0% 48.5% 45.0% 6 days ago 51.0% 57.0% 48.5% 47.0% 5 days ago 51.5% 53.0% 48.5% 47.0% 4 days ago 57.5% 56.0% 42.5% 47.0% 3 days ago 56.5% 56.0% 43.0% 48.0% 2 days ago 55.0% 56.0% 44.5% 47.0% yesterday 56.0% 57.0% 44.0% 44.0% today 55.5% 56.5% 44.0% 43.5% rGeorgia Senate
POLYMARKET: Georgia Senate — general election
Jon Ossoff (D) faces Mike Collins (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Georgia Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 0.9pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Georgia Senate. Jon Ossoff (D): Polymarket 92.5%, Kalshi 91.6%; Mike Collins (R): Polymarket 7.35%, Kalshi 7.85%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.9pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Jon Ossoff 92% · Mike Collins 7.8%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Jon Ossoff (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$44.1K93.0%Kalshi320K contracts · 92%/92%91.5%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-0.5ppMike Collins (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$71.7K7.7%Kalshi774K contracts · 7.7%/8.0%8.5%venue gap0.8pp7-day move-0.4ppEvery sample behind the chart. Georgia Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Jon Ossoff · Polymarket Jon Ossoff · Kalshi Mike Collins · Polymarket Mike Collins · Kalshi 7 days ago 93.0% 91.5% 7.70% 8.50% 6 days ago 93.0% 91.7% 7.70% 8.90% 5 days ago 93.0% 92.0% 7.55% 8.70% 4 days ago 92.5% 92.3% 7.60% 8.70% 3 days ago 92.5% 92.3% 7.35% 8.40% 2 days ago 93.5% 92.3% 5.55% 8.50% yesterday 92.5% 92.4% 7.45% 8.30% today 92.5% 91.6% 7.35% 7.85% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
kIowa Senate
POLYMARKET: Iowa Senate — general election
Ashley Hinson (R) faces Josh Turek (D).
An open seat, with no incumbent running, and the Republican side holds a clear lead.
Two markets, one question
Iowa Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Iowa Senate. Ashley Hinson (R): Polymarket 60.5%, Kalshi 58.5%; Josh Turek (D): Polymarket 40.0%, Kalshi 41.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Ashley Hinson 59% · Josh Turek 41%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Ashley Hinson (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$105K57%Kalshi890K contracts · 58%/59%55%venue gap2.0pp7-day move+3.5ppJosh Turek (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$104K43.5%Kalshi772K contracts · 41%/42%45.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-3.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Iowa Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Ashley Hinson · Polymarket Ashley Hinson · Kalshi Josh Turek · Polymarket Josh Turek · Kalshi 7 days ago 57.0% 55.0% 43.5% 45.0% 6 days ago 57.5% 55.0% 43.0% 45.0% 5 days ago 57.5% 55.0% 43.5% 45.0% 4 days ago 59.5% 56.0% 40.5% 43.0% 3 days ago 59.5% 57.0% 40.5% 43.0% 2 days ago 60.0% 59.0% 40.0% 42.0% yesterday 60.5% 60.0% 40.0% 42.0% today 60.5% 58.5% 40.0% 41.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
iMaine Senate
POLYMARKET: Maine Senate — general election
Troy Jackson (D) faces Susan Collins (R).
Democrats only got a candidate here after their primary winner withdrew, and the Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Maine Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 4.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Maine Senate. Troy Jackson (D): Polymarket 69.5%, Kalshi 65.5%; Susan Collins (R): Polymarket 30.5%, Kalshi 34.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 4.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Troy Jackson 67% · Susan Collins 34%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Troy Jackson (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$717K69.5%Kalshi1.8M contracts · 65%/66%66.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move0.0ppSusan Collins (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$439K29.5%Kalshi2.1M contracts · 34%/35%35.0%venue gap5.5pp7-day move+1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Maine Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Troy Jackson · Polymarket Troy Jackson · Kalshi Susan Collins · Polymarket Susan Collins · Kalshi 7 days ago 69.5% 66.0% 29.5% 35.0% 6 days ago 69.5% 66.0% 29.5% 36.0% 5 days ago 69.5% 66.0% 29.5% 36.0% 4 days ago 69.5% 66.0% 29.5% 36.0% 3 days ago 69.5% 66.0% 30.5% 36.0% 2 days ago 69.5% 66.0% 30.5% 35.0% yesterday 69.5% 66.0% 30.5% 35.0% today 69.5% 65.5% 30.5% 34.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
lMichigan Senate
POLYMARKET: Michigan Senate — general election
Abdul El-Sayed (D) faces Mike Rogers (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead after gaining about seven points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Michigan Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Michigan Senate. Abdul El-Sayed (D): Polymarket 64.5%, Kalshi 62.5%; Mike Rogers (R): Polymarket 36.5%, Kalshi 38.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Abdul El-Sayed 63% · Mike Rogers 38%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Abdul El-Sayed (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$268K55.5%Kalshi945K contracts · 62%/63%58.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+9.0ppMike Rogers (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$242K43.5%Kalshi1.2M contracts · 38%/39%44.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move-7.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Michigan Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Abdul El-Sayed · Polymarket Abdul El-Sayed · Kalshi Mike Rogers · Polymarket Mike Rogers · Kalshi 7 days ago 55.5% 58.0% 43.5% 44.0% 6 days ago 55.5% 54.0% 45.5% 46.0% 5 days ago 58.0% 56.0% 42.5% 45.0% 4 days ago 58.5% 57.0% 41.5% 44.0% 3 days ago 58.5% 58.0% 41.5% 43.0% 2 days ago 61.5% 56.0% 38.5% 43.0% yesterday 64.5% 62.0% 36.5% 39.0% today 64.5% 62.5% 36.5% 38.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
sNebraska Senate
POLYMARKET: Nebraska Senate — general election
Pete Ricketts (R) faces Dan Osborn (I).
The Republican side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Nebraska Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Nebraska Senate. Pete Ricketts (R): Polymarket 71.5%, Kalshi 70.5%; Dan Osborn (I): Polymarket 28.5%, Kalshi 29.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Pete Ricketts 71% · Dan Osborn 29%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Pete Ricketts (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$80.1K71.5%Kalshi239K contracts · 70%/71%71.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move0.0ppDan Osborn (I)7 days agoPolymarket$25.1K28%Kalshi345K contracts · 28%/30%30%venue gap2.0pp7-day move+0.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Nebraska Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Pete Ricketts · Polymarket Pete Ricketts · Kalshi Dan Osborn · Polymarket Dan Osborn · Kalshi 7 days ago 71.5% 71.0% 28.0% 30% 6 days ago 71.0% 71.0% 29.0% 30% 5 days ago 71.5% 70.0% 28.0% 30% 4 days ago 71.5% 71.0% 28.5% 30% 3 days ago 71.5% 71.0% 27.5% 29% 2 days ago 71.5% 71.0% 28.5% 29% yesterday 71.5% 71.0% 28.5% 28% today 71.5% 70.5% 28.5% 29% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
tNew Hampshire Senate
POLYMARKET: New Hampshire Senate — general election
Chris Pappas (D) leads the unresolved Democratic primary; John E. Sununu (R) leads the unresolved Republican primary.
Neither nomination is official yet, though the market already treats both as decided.
Two markets, one question
New Hampshire Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
New Hampshire Senate. Chris Pappas (D): Polymarket 85.5%, Kalshi 87.5%; John E. Sununu (R): Polymarket 15.0%, Kalshi 12.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Chris Pappas 87% · John E. Sununu 13%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Chris Pappas (D)*7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$29.0K85%Kalshi70.6K contracts · 87%/88%89%venue gap4.0pp7-day move+0.5ppJohn E. Sununu (R)*7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$18.4K14%Kalshi107K contracts · 12%/13%12%venue gap2.0pp7-day move+1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. New Hampshire Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Chris Pappas · Polymarket Chris Pappas · Kalshi John E. Sununu · Polymarket John E. Sununu · Kalshi 7 days ago 85.0% 89.0% 14.0% 12.0% 6 days ago 85.5% 88.0% 14.5% 13.0% 5 days ago 85.5% 90.4% 14.5% 13.0% 4 days ago 85.5% 88.0% 13.5% 12.0% 3 days ago 85.5% 87.0% 15.0% 13.0% 2 days ago 85.5% 87.0% 15.0% 12.0% yesterday 85.5% 87.0% 15.0% 13.0% today 85.5% 87.5% 15.0% 12.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
qNorth Carolina Senate
POLYMARKET: North Carolina Senate — general election
Roy Cooper (D) faces Michael Whatley (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
North Carolina Senate
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 0.7pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
North Carolina Senate. Roy Cooper (D): Polymarket 92.5%, Kalshi 92.7%; Michael Whatley (R): Polymarket 8.0%, Kalshi 7.3%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.7pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Roy Cooper 93% · Michael Whatley 7.5%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Roy Cooper (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$37.0K92.5%Kalshi1.2M contracts · 92%/93%92.9%venue gap0.4pp7-day move0.0ppMichael Whatley (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$58.0K8.5%Kalshi177K contracts · 6.4%/8.2%7.6%venue gap0.9pp7-day move-0.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. North Carolina Senate, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Roy Cooper · Polymarket Roy Cooper · Kalshi Michael Whatley · Polymarket Michael Whatley · Kalshi 7 days ago 92.5% 92.9% 8.5% 7.6% 6 days ago 92.5% 92.8% 8.5% 8.0% 5 days ago 92.5% 91.7% 8.5% 8.3% 4 days ago 91.5% 91.6% 9.5% 8.3% 3 days ago 92.0% 92.6% 7.5% 8.2% 2 days ago 93.5% 92.8% 7.5% 8.3% yesterday 92.5% 93.2% 8.0% 8.3% today 92.5% 92.7% 8.0% 7.3% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
Governors11 of 12
vAlaska governor
POLYMARKET: Alaska governor — general election
Bernadette Wilson (R) faces Tom Begich (D).
Wilson holds a clear lead, but no race here has moved more this week: Begich is down about 28 points.
Two markets, one question
Alaska governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Alaska governor. Bernadette Wilson (R): Polymarket 35.5%, Kalshi 35.0%; Tom Begich (D): Polymarket 25.0%, Kalshi 22.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Series run 6–8 samples because the venues listed these markets on different days; a short line starts late rather than being stretched across a week it was never priced over.
Money-weighted: Bernadette Wilson 35% · Tom Begich 24%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Bernadette Wilson (R)7 days agoPolymarket$165K26%Kalshi34.2K contracts · 34%/36%—venue gap—7-day move+9.5ppTom Begich (D)7 days agoPolymarket$147K53.5%Kalshi109K contracts · 22%/23%50.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move-29ppEvery sample behind the chart. Alaska governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Bernadette Wilson · Polymarket Bernadette Wilson · Kalshi Tom Begich · Polymarket Tom Begich · Kalshi 7 days ago 26.0% — 53.5% 50.0% 6 days ago 26.0% — 53.0% 50.0% 5 days ago 26.0% 28% 54.0% 52.0% 4 days ago 25.5% 22% 49.0% 50.0% 3 days ago 27.5% 16% 50.0% 49.0% 2 days ago 27.5% 22% 25.0% 50.0% yesterday 35.5% 38% 25.0% 25.0% today 35.5% 35% 25.0% 22.5% xArizona governor
POLYMARKET: Arizona governor — general election
Katie Hobbs (D) faces Andy Biggs (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Arizona governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 3.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Arizona governor. Katie Hobbs (D): Polymarket 87.5%, Kalshi 84.5%; Andy Biggs (R): Polymarket 12.5%, Kalshi 14.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 3.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Katie Hobbs 85% · Andy Biggs 14%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Katie Hobbs (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$30.8K87.5%Kalshi285K contracts · 84%/85%88.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move0.0ppAndy Biggs (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$35.9K12.5%Kalshi219K contracts · 14%/15%15.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Arizona governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Katie Hobbs · Polymarket Katie Hobbs · Kalshi Andy Biggs · Polymarket Andy Biggs · Kalshi 7 days ago 87.5% 88.0% 12.5% 15.0% 6 days ago 87.0% 87.0% 13.0% 15.0% 5 days ago 87.0% 87.0% 13.0% 15.0% 4 days ago 87.0% 85.0% 13.5% 15.0% 3 days ago 87.5% 88.0% 13.0% 16.0% 2 days ago 87.5% 84.0% 12.5% 16.0% yesterday 87.5% 87.0% 12.0% 16.0% today 87.5% 84.5% 12.5% 14.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
abFlorida governor
POLYMARKET: Florida governor — general election
Byron Donalds (R) faces David Jolly (D).
Florida's governor's office is open, and the Republican side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Florida governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Florida governor. Byron Donalds (R): Polymarket 82.5%, Kalshi 81.5%; David Jolly (D): Polymarket 18.5%, Kalshi 20.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Byron Donalds 82% · David Jolly 20%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Byron Donalds (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$16.4K82.5%Kalshi141K contracts · 81%/82%82.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move0.0ppDavid Jolly (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$21.7K17%Kalshi150K contracts · 19%/22%20%venue gap3.0pp7-day move+1.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Florida governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Byron Donalds · Polymarket Byron Donalds · Kalshi David Jolly · Polymarket David Jolly · Kalshi 7 days ago 82.5% 82.0% 17.0% 20.0% 6 days ago 82.5% 83.0% 18.0% 21.0% 5 days ago 82.5% 81.0% 18.0% 23.0% 4 days ago 82.5% 80.0% 18.5% 20.0% 3 days ago 83.5% 81.0% 17.5% 21.0% 2 days ago 82.5% 81.0% 17.5% 22.0% yesterday 82.5% 82.0% 18.5% 21.0% today 82.5% 81.5% 18.5% 20.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
oGeorgia governor
POLYMARKET: Georgia governor — general election
Keisha Lance Bottoms (D) faces Rick Jackson (R).
Georgia's governor's office is open, and the Democratic side holds a clear lead.
Two markets, one question
Georgia governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 0.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Georgia governor. Keisha Lance Bottoms (D): Polymarket 59.5%, Kalshi 59.5%; Rick Jackson (R): Polymarket 41.0%, Kalshi 41.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Keisha Lance Bottoms 60% · Rick Jackson 41%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Keisha Lance Bottoms (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$31.0K64%Kalshi261K contracts · 59%/60%61%venue gap3.0pp7-day move-4.5ppRick Jackson (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$36.1K36.5%Kalshi333K contracts · 41%/42%40.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move+4.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Georgia governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Keisha Lance Bottoms · Polymarket Keisha Lance Bottoms · Kalshi Rick Jackson · Polymarket Rick Jackson · Kalshi 7 days ago 64.0% 61.0% 36.5% 40.0% 6 days ago 63.5% 61.0% 37.0% 42.0% 5 days ago 62.0% 60.0% 37.0% 41.0% 4 days ago 62.5% 60.0% 37.5% 42.0% 3 days ago 59.5% 60.0% 40.5% 42.0% 2 days ago 60.0% 61.0% 41.0% 42.0% yesterday 59.0% 62.0% 41.0% 42.0% today 59.5% 59.5% 41.0% 41.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
uIowa governor
POLYMARKET: Iowa governor — general election
Rob Sand (D) faces Zach Lahn (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead after gaining about three points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Iowa governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 4.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Iowa governor. Rob Sand (D): Polymarket 73.5%, Kalshi 77.5%; Zach Lahn (R): Polymarket 25.5%, Kalshi 22.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 4.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Rob Sand 77% · Zach Lahn 23%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Rob Sand (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$27.4K72.5%Kalshi193K contracts · 77%/78%72.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move+1.0ppZach Lahn (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$39.8K26%Kalshi216K contracts · 22%/23%28%venue gap2.0pp7-day move-0.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Iowa governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Rob Sand · Polymarket Rob Sand · Kalshi Zach Lahn · Polymarket Zach Lahn · Kalshi 7 days ago 72.5% 72.0% 26.0% 28.0% 6 days ago 72.0% 72.0% 26.5% 28.0% 5 days ago 72.0% 72.0% 26.5% 28.0% 4 days ago 72.5% 74.0% 27.5% 27.0% 3 days ago 75.0% 75.0% 26.0% 26.0% 2 days ago 77.5% 78.0% 23.5% 24.0% yesterday 73.5% 77.0% 25.5% 23.0% today 73.5% 77.5% 25.5% 22.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
wMichigan governor
POLYMARKET: Michigan governor — general election
Jocelyn Benson (D) faces John James (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead after the Republican side lost about three points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Michigan governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Michigan governor. Jocelyn Benson (D): Polymarket 88%, Kalshi 86%; John James (R): Polymarket 13%, Kalshi 13%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Jocelyn Benson 87% · John James 13%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Jocelyn Benson (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$47.5K84%Kalshi71.8K contracts · 85%/87%86%venue gap2.0pp7-day move+4.0ppJohn James (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$151K15%Kalshi115K contracts · 12%/14%17%venue gap2.0pp7-day move-2.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Michigan governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Jocelyn Benson · Polymarket Jocelyn Benson · Kalshi John James · Polymarket John James · Kalshi 7 days ago 84.0% 86% 15.0% 17% 6 days ago 85.5% 84% 15.0% 16% 5 days ago 85.5% 84% 15.0% 16% 4 days ago 85.5% 88% 15.0% 17% 3 days ago 86.0% 88% 15.0% 14% 2 days ago 88.0% 85% 12.5% 15% yesterday 88.0% 87% 13.0% 14% today 88.0% 86% 13.0% 13% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
pNevada governor
POLYMARKET: Nevada governor — general election
Joe Lombardo (R) faces Aaron Ford (D).
Nevada's Republican governor is defending his job, and the Republican side holds a clear lead after the Democratic side gained about five points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Nevada governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 1.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Nevada governor. Joe Lombardo (R): Polymarket 57.0%, Kalshi 58.5%; Aaron Ford (D): Polymarket 43.5%, Kalshi 44.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Joe Lombardo 58% · Aaron Ford 44%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Joe Lombardo (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$48.1K63%Kalshi221K contracts · 58%/59%63%venue gap0.0pp7-day move-6.0ppAaron Ford (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$21.9K36.5%Kalshi461K contracts · 42%/46%41.0%venue gap4.5pp7-day move+7.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Nevada governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Joe Lombardo · Polymarket Joe Lombardo · Kalshi Aaron Ford · Polymarket Aaron Ford · Kalshi 7 days ago 63.0% 63.0% 36.5% 41% 6 days ago 62.5% 62.0% 37.5% 36% 5 days ago 63.5% 62.0% 36.0% 40% 4 days ago 60.5% 61.0% 38.5% 37% 3 days ago 57.5% 59.0% 43.0% 44% 2 days ago 55.5% 61.0% 43.5% 40% yesterday 57.0% 59.0% 43.5% 45% today 57.0% 58.5% 43.5% 44% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
zNew York governor
POLYMARKET: New York governor — general election
Kathy Hochul (D) faces Bruce Blakeman (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
New York governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 0.2pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
New York governor. Kathy Hochul (D): Polymarket 94.50%, Kalshi 94.65%; Bruce Blakeman (R): Polymarket 5.5%, Kalshi 5.3%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.2pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Kathy Hochul 95% · Bruce Blakeman 5.3%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Kathy Hochul (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$49.0K93.5%Kalshi244K contracts · 94%/95%93.5%venue gap0.0pp7-day move+1.0ppBruce Blakeman (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$49.1K6%Kalshi550K contracts · 4.9%/5.7%8%venue gap2.0pp7-day move-0.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. New York governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Kathy Hochul · Polymarket Kathy Hochul · Kalshi Bruce Blakeman · Polymarket Bruce Blakeman · Kalshi 7 days ago 93.5% 93.50% 6.0% 8.0% 6 days ago 93.5% 93.50% 6.0% 7.9% 5 days ago 94.0% 93.40% 6.0% 7.9% 4 days ago 94.5% 93.70% 5.5% 8.0% 3 days ago 94.5% 93.30% 5.5% 8.0% 2 days ago 94.5% 95.10% 5.5% 5.6% yesterday 94.5% 95.40% 5.5% 5.8% today 94.5% 94.65% 5.5% 5.3% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
aaPennsylvania governor
POLYMARKET: Pennsylvania governor — general election
Josh Shapiro (D) faces Stacy Garrity (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Pennsylvania governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 0.9pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Pennsylvania governor. Josh Shapiro (D): Polymarket 95.5%, Kalshi 94.8%; Stacy Garrity (R): Polymarket 4.5%, Kalshi 3.6%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.9pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Series run 3–8 samples because the venues listed these markets on different days; a short line starts late rather than being stretched across a week it was never priced over.
Money-weighted: Josh Shapiro 95% · Stacy Garrity 3.7%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Josh Shapiro (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$7.3K95.5%Kalshi68.0K contracts · 93%/97%—venue gap—7-day move0.0ppStacy Garrity (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$21.9K5.5%Kalshi352K contracts · 2.8%/4.4%—venue gap—7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Pennsylvania governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Josh Shapiro · Polymarket Josh Shapiro · Kalshi Stacy Garrity · Polymarket Stacy Garrity · Kalshi 7 days ago 95.5% — 5.5% — 6 days ago 95.5% — 5.5% — 5 days ago 95.5% — 5.5% — 4 days ago 95.5% — 5.5% — 3 days ago 95.5% — 5.0% — 2 days ago 95.5% 95.5% 5.5% 6.7% yesterday 95.5% 95.6% 4.5% 4.0% today 95.5% 94.8% 4.5% 3.6% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
yTexas governor
POLYMARKET: Texas governor — general election
Greg Abbott (R) faces Gina Hinojosa (D).
The Republican side holds a commanding lead after gaining about four points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Texas governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Texas governor. Greg Abbott (R): Polymarket 88.5%, Kalshi 89.5%; Gina Hinojosa (D): Polymarket 12.0%, Kalshi 11.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Greg Abbott 89% · Gina Hinojosa 12%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Greg Abbott (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$25.7K84.3%Kalshi129K contracts · 89%/90%86.0%venue gap1.7pp7-day move+4.2ppGina Hinojosa (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$32.1K16%Kalshi534K contracts · 11%/12%15%venue gap1.0pp7-day move-4.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Texas governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day Greg Abbott · Polymarket Greg Abbott · Kalshi Gina Hinojosa · Polymarket Gina Hinojosa · Kalshi 7 days ago 84.30% 86.0% 16.0% 15.0% 6 days ago 84.65% 87.0% 16.0% 15.0% 5 days ago 84.60% 87.0% 15.5% 15.0% 4 days ago 85.85% 87.0% 15.0% 14.0% 3 days ago 86.30% 88.0% 14.5% 14.0% 2 days ago 85.70% 86.0% 14.5% 16.0% yesterday 88.50% 90.0% 12.0% 11.0% today 88.50% 89.5% 12.0% 11.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
nWisconsin governor
POLYMARKET: Wisconsin governor — general election
David Crowley (D) faces Tom Tiffany (R).
An open governorship, and the Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Wisconsin governor
Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT
widest venue gap 3.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Wisconsin governor. David Crowley (D): Polymarket 77.5%, Kalshi 74.5%; Tom Tiffany (R): Polymarket 23.5%, Kalshi 25.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 3.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: David Crowley 75% · Tom Tiffany 25%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
David Crowley (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$114K77.5%Kalshi406K contracts · 74%/75%77.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move0.0ppTom Tiffany (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$185K23.5%Kalshi442K contracts · 25%/26%26.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Wisconsin governor, snapshot Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. Day David Crowley · Polymarket David Crowley · Kalshi Tom Tiffany · Polymarket Tom Tiffany · Kalshi 7 days ago 77.5% 77.0% 23.5% 26.0% 6 days ago 76.5% 73.0% 23.5% 27.0% 5 days ago 75.5% 72.0% 23.5% 29.0% 4 days ago 76.5% 74.0% 23.5% 28.0% 3 days ago 77.5% 75.0% 23.5% 26.0% 2 days ago 77.5% 75.0% 23.5% 26.0% yesterday 77.5% 74.0% 23.5% 25.0% today 77.5% 74.5% 23.5% 25.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
“Still in doubt” means no leader above 80% on either book. Prices captured Aug 20, 6:46 AM CT. These are trader-implied estimates, not polls. Separate contracts trade independently, so opposing prices may not add to exactly 100%.
