Blanche scraps a $1.8 billion political-targeting claims fund and wins two GOP confirmation votes
The still-unopened fund came from Trump's IRS settlement and would have let a DOJ commission pay people alleging political targeting.
Todd Blanche rescinded DOJ's proposed $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund after John Cornyn (Sen-R Texas) and Thom Tillis (Sen-R North Carolina) refused to advance his attorney general nomination without a written order ending it. Both senators then backed him. The program had no commissioners, rules or applicants. If it had opened, an attorney-general-appointed commission could have issued apologies or payments to people who said federal officials targeted them for political, personal or ideological reasons.
ContextDOJ [created it in May](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-anti-weaponization-fund) as part of a settlement in *Trump v. IRS*. Donald Trump, his sons and the Trump Organization agreed to dismiss a lawsuit over the leak of their tax returns, and withdraw administrative claims tied to the Mar-a-Lago search and the Russia investigation, in exchange for a formal apology and the fund's creation. Trump and the other plaintiffs received no direct monetary damages under the settlement. A five-member commission appointed by the attorney general would have decided who qualified for an apology or payment. The money was to come from the Treasury's Judgment Fund, a permanent appropriation used to pay settlements, rather than a new $1.776 billion line item voted on by Congress. That made the dispute larger than a nomination fight: it tested whether an executive-branch settlement could create a broad compensation system for politically charged claims without a fresh appropriation. DOJ cited the $760 million Keepseagle farm-discrimination settlement as precedent; this proposed fund was more than twice as large.
AP30 sources