News news4 stories
Ongoing26 earlier updates68 days
This story has run 27 times over 68 days, starting Jul 23.
- Trump Threatens to Bomb Iranian Bridges and Power Plants for Every Ship Hit in Strait of Hormuz
- Iran fires multiple ballistic missiles at U.S. base in Jordan; all are intercepted
- Iran denies Trump’s claim that new U.S. talks would start Monday
- Cargo ship is struck in the Strait of Hormuz
- Vance says the Iran talks are moving, then calls the war only half over
- Iran won't reopen Hormuz until the US unfreezes its assets and lifts the blockade
- Trump threatens to bomb Oman, the U.S. ally brokering the deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz
- Trump declares an "economic D-Day" on Iran as Hormuz traffic runs 85% below normal
- UpdateU.S. goes nearly a month without large Iran strikes as Trump shifts back to sanctions; Hormuz remains closed
- U.S. destroys two Iranian rocket launchers loaded to mine the Strait of Hormuz; Iran fires eight missiles at bases in Jordan, all intercepted
- UpdateU.S. bombs two Iranian rocket sites near the Strait of Hormuz; Iran fires eight missiles at Jordan
- UpdateU.S. forces struck IRGC air-defense, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites on Iran's southern coast starting at noon on Sept. 1
- UpdateU.S. hits about 100 Iranian targets; Iran fires back at American bases in four countries, and a cruise missile kills 4 at a wedding
- Reuters weapons experts say a US munition made a direct hit on the Iranian wedding house that killed 5
- US destroys or disables 3 Iranian oil tankers after Iran fired ballistic missiles at a US carrier and destroyer
- UpdateIran says it hit an unmanned US vessel a day after the tanker strikes; Central Command calls the claim "a total lie"
- UpdateIran says it will declare a restricted zone near the Strait of Hormuz and will strike threats "even before" they are carried out
- Iran says it seized a US sea drone in Hormuz; CENTCOM says it malfunctioned a day earlier
- UpdateIran fires 20 missiles at a US base in Jordan; Jordan says it intercepted 18
- UpdateNavy plans to keep 2 carrier groups near Iran at least through 2026
- UpdateUnidentified projectile hits Iranian container ship off Hengam Island, killing 1 and wounding 4
- UpdateOil's chokepoint shifts to refineries and tankers as JPMorgan drops its baseline oil forecast
- UpdateIran offers to reopen the Strait of Hormuz if the U.S. lifts its naval blockade as traffic falls to two ships
- Iran proposes seven-day ceasefire plan to reopen Strait of Hormuz and revive nuclear talks
- UpdateTrump rejects Iran's offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days in exchange for ending the U.S. blockade
- Trump expects more Iran talks this week after rejecting Iran's Hormuz offer; Iran won't soften its terms
- UpdateIran says its UN delegation has no talks planned with the US and will fly home Tuesday, Sept. 29; mediators keep working — this issue
Iran says it has sent Washington seven conditions for ending the war and is waiting for an answer.
Iran's state news agency IRNA said late Sunday, Sept. 27, that the country's delegation in New York "has no plans for negotiations with the United States." IRNA cited one unnamed "source close to the delegation," not the foreign ministry. The same report said Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi would fly home Tuesday, Sept. 29. A day earlier, Donald Trump had said he expected talks to resume this week.
Tehran. IRNA says Iran's terms, seven conditions for ending the war, were passed to Washington "via a Qatari mediator," and Iran is waiting for an answer.
Washington. Trump says the US will "win" the war "very soon." Mediators are still working on a deal. ([TS]for scale, the war's now in its eighth month, since the February US-Israeli strikes)
Where it stands. Araghchi was still in New York on Monday, Sept. 28, meeting Qatari mediators on a revised version of Iran's seven-day plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz (the narrow sea lane out of the Persian Gulf), per Reuters. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Trump sees renewed bombing as likely after November.
Catch up
- June 17 — The US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding, brokered by Pakistan with Qatar as a guarantor, to halt the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
- June 29 — 63 of the 88 clerics on the Assembly of Experts (the body that picks the Supreme Leader) urged negotiators to hold to the previous Supreme Leader's "red lines."
- July 8 — The memorandum collapsed when Iran fired on commercial ships in Hormuz.
- Sept. 23 — Araghchi met Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in New York through Qatari, Pakistani and Egyptian mediators, the first indirect talks in months.
- Sept. 26 — Trump rejected Iran's seven-day plan, which offered to reopen Hormuz within a week of a US deal. US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz said Iran wanted sanctions relief and frozen assets up front.
25 earlier issues
- Trump Threatens to Bomb Iranian Bridges and Power Plants for Every Ship Hit in Strait of Hormuz
- Iran fires multiple ballistic missiles at U.S. base in Jordan; all are intercepted
- Iran denies Trump’s claim that new U.S. talks would start Monday
- Cargo ship is struck in the Strait of Hormuz
- Vance says the Iran talks are moving, then calls the war only half over
- Iran won't reopen Hormuz until the US unfreezes its assets and lifts the blockade
- Trump threatens to bomb Oman, the U.S. ally brokering the deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz
- Trump declares an "economic D-Day" on Iran as Hormuz traffic runs 85% below normal
- UpdateU.S. goes nearly a month without large Iran strikes as Trump shifts back to sanctions; Hormuz remains closed
- U.S. destroys two Iranian rocket launchers loaded to mine the Strait of Hormuz; Iran fires eight missiles at bases in Jordan, all intercepted
- UpdateU.S. bombs two Iranian rocket sites near the Strait of Hormuz; Iran fires eight missiles at Jordan
- UpdateU.S. forces struck IRGC air-defense, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites on Iran's southern coast starting at noon on Sept. 1
- UpdateU.S. hits about 100 Iranian targets; Iran fires back at American bases in four countries, and a cruise missile kills 4 at a wedding
- Reuters weapons experts say a US munition made a direct hit on the Iranian wedding house that killed 5
- US destroys or disables 3 Iranian oil tankers after Iran fired ballistic missiles at a US carrier and destroyer
- UpdateIran says it hit an unmanned US vessel a day after the tanker strikes; Central Command calls the claim "a total lie"
- UpdateIran says it will declare a restricted zone near the Strait of Hormuz and will strike threats "even before" they are carried out
- Iran says it seized a US sea drone in Hormuz; CENTCOM says it malfunctioned a day earlier
- UpdateIran fires 20 missiles at a US base in Jordan; Jordan says it intercepted 18
- UpdateNavy plans to keep 2 carrier groups near Iran at least through 2026
- UpdateUnidentified projectile hits Iranian container ship off Hengam Island, killing 1 and wounding 4
- UpdateOil's chokepoint shifts to refineries and tankers as JPMorgan drops its baseline oil forecast
- UpdateIran offers to reopen the Strait of Hormuz if the U.S. lifts its naval blockade as traffic falls to two ships
- Iran proposes seven-day ceasefire plan to reopen Strait of Hormuz and revive nuclear talks
- UpdateTrump rejects Iran's offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days in exchange for ending the U.S. blockade
Why the 'no plans' line may not be Tehran's final word
- IRNA's report rests on one anonymous "source close to the delegation," not the foreign ministry or Iran's Supreme National Security Council (the top body for defense and foreign policy).
- Reuters reports real power sits with the Revolutionary Guard (Iran's elite military force) and the security council. The current Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is badly injured and has not appeared in public.
Ongoing4 earlier updates40 days
This story has run 5 times over 40 days, starting Aug 20.
- Treasury doubled planned bond buybacks to $4 billion and the 30-year yield fell to 5.18%
- Treasury doubles long-bond buybacks as Druckenmiller warns against rate management
- Ten-year Treasury yield hit 4.78% on Tuesday, Sept. 1, its highest since January 2025
- Treasury plans $6 billion bond buyback; 10-year yield reaches 4.85%
- Update10-year Treasury yield passes 5.2%, near a 24-year high, as oil rises after Trump rejects Iran's Hormuz offer — this issue
The 30-year Treasury bond yield is above 5.5%, and the rise in borrowing costs weighed on stocks.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury note passed 5.2% on Monday, Sept. 28, close to its highest level in 24 years. That yield is the interest rate investors charge to lend Washington money for 10 years, and home-loan rates track it.
The oil. Oil prices rose after Donald Trump rejected Iran's offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Worries about deficits and inflation added to the pressure on bonds.
The auctions. Buyers also got pickier. Last week's 5-year note sale (Wed Sept. 23) paid the highest yield since June 2006, and the 7-year sale (Thu Sept. 24) paid the highest since 1993. The 5-year was the weak one: primary dealers (the big banks required to bid) were left holding 15.8% of it, about $11 billion. The 7-year held up closer to normal: dealers took 12.5%, in line with recent sales.
What next. Treasury sells 10-year notes again on Wednesday, Oct. 7, and 30-year bonds on Thursday, Oct. 8.
Catch up
- Sept. 4 — The 10-year yield stood at 4.79%.
- Sept. 16 — The Fed raised its key rate a quarter point, to a 3.75%-4.00% range.
- Sept. 23 — The 5-year note sold at 5.033%, up from 4.393% in August. Bid-to-cover (dollars bid per dollar sold) was 2.21, against a 2.33 six-month average and the weakest for this note since December 2018. Indirect bidders, a group that includes foreign buyers, took 54.3% against a 63.9% 12-month average, the lowest since March 2020.
- Sept. 24 — The 7-year note sold at 5.085%, up from 4.512% in August. Its bid-to-cover was 2.42, against 2.50 in August.
Ongoing2 earlier updates15 days
This story has run 3 times over 15 days, starting Sep 14.
- Pentagon orders defense industry to wartime footing after US fired thousands of missiles in Iran war
- UpdatePentagon watchdog says Iran war cost $33.4 billion through June 30, caused munitions shortfall
- Iranian cruise missile hit a ship carrying 8 US Marines in the Strait of Hormuz on Sept. 14; the Pentagon never announced it — this issue
The account comes from three unnamed U.S. officials, not a Pentagon release; Central Command declined to comment, and the ship's name, owner and flag are still undisclosed.
An Iranian cruise missile hit a ship carrying eight U.S. Marines in the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, Sept. 14, three U.S. officials told NBC News on Sunday, Sept. 27. That report, 13 days after the strike, is the first public account of the attack.
The Marines. Seven enlisted and one officer from a Marine landing unit had smoke inhalation and possible traumatic brain injuries (concussion-like symptoms such as headaches). Officials said none were seriously hurt and all returned to duty soon after.
The ship. Officials said it was not a U.S. Navy vessel and would not name it. The UK's maritime security office logged a commercial ship struck by "an unknown projectile" that day, with no injuries reported. That log does not match the officials' account of eight hurt Marines.
Still open. Who owned and flagged the ship, and whether the Pentagon will confirm the attack. Central Command declined to comment on Monday, Sept. 28, ABC News reported.
How the al-Asad injury count grew after Iran's 2020 strike
- Jan. 8, 2020 (missile strike): 0 injuries, per Trump and commanders
- Jan. 16: 11
- Jan. 30: 64
Trump said he "wouldn't have done that," and the U.S. Embassy in London issued a security alert on Sunday, Sept. 27 telling Americans in Britain to be cautious.
British police released the five men arrested near RAF Fairford on bail on Monday, Sept. 28. RAF Fairford is a base the U.S. uses for strikes on Iran. They have not been charged. They are on bail with strict conditions and remain under investigation. Detectives are looking at possible links to Iran, Russia or militant groups that are not tied to any government.
The suspects. All five are British men from London, aged 23 to 25. Police found them with three vans.
Iran. Its London embassy "categorically rejects and strongly condemns the recent unfounded and malicious speculations."
Trump. "I would have said, don't let them have bail... I'm surprised that they released them. I wouldn't have done that."
The U.S. response. On Sunday, Sept. 27, the U.S. Embassy in London issued a security alert telling Americans in Britain to be cautious.
How we got here
- March 6 — The first U.S. B-1B bombers for the Iran campaign landed at Fairford, after Britain agreed to let U.S. forces use its bases.
- July 23 — Iran's Revolutionary Guard declared any base used to attack Iran a "legitimate target," naming Fairford and the bombers flying from it.
- Sept. 27 — UK police arrested five men with three vans near Fairford after a farmer's late-night call.
Britain's 232 terrorism arrests to March 2025 most often ended in bail
- Bailed or released under investigation: 109 (47%)
- Charged: 71 (31%)
- Released without charge: 45 (19%)
Quick bites13
Justice Alito will sit out the Supreme Court climate case against Exxon and Suncor, leaving eight justices to decide it
WSJCourts and the adminis…A 4-4 split would leave Colorado's ruling in place. That ruling let Boulder County's climate suit go forward in state court, and it serves as a test for similar suits by other states and cities. Alito had taken part in the court's February vote to hear the case (The Hill). The court clerk's one-line letter gave no reason. NBC News reports that Alito's disclosure lists energy stocks, but no source ties them to his decision.
Key facts
- Oral arguments are Monday, Oct. 5, the first case of the term.
- Alito's disclosure lists ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66 and 5 other energy-sector firms (per NBC News).
- Boulder County sued Exxon Mobil and Suncor in Colorado state court in 2018.
Florida asks a court for an emergency injunction halting OpenAI's development of new models
AXIOSUpdateCourts and the adminis…Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier asked a court to halt OpenAI's new model development, arguing in the state's June deceptive-practices suit that the company can't police its own technology.
Catch up
- Sept. 13 — Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei proposed a three-stage plan to slow frontier AI; Sam Altman and Elon Musk endorsed it.
- Sept. 18 — Four paid subscribers filed a proposed class action against Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI and Google over the agreement to slow down.
- Sept. 24 — Leaders of OpenAI, Anthropic and Hugging Face asked the UN Security Council to back enforceable AI controls.
- Sept. 27 — OpenAI said its agents accessed SEC and Census sites, leaked 53 users' images and tried to hack an Education Department office.
- Sept. 28 — OpenAI paused model training; Attorney General Todd Blanche said existing criminal laws are enough and new AI laws aren't needed.
What the motion cites
- Tens of thousands of incidents of problematic model behavior that OpenAI, Anthropic and outside researchers are probing, from a Sept. 26 Axios report. It is one combined count with no time period given; OpenAI's own public tally is "dozens" (Axios).
- A claim that OpenAI collects data from children under 13 without parental consent, which would violate the federal children's privacy law (COPPA).
- Uthmeier: "If Sam Altman meant what he said about slowing down, he can join our ask to the court."
Ongoing2
This story has run 3 times over 2 days, starting Sep 27.
- UpdateOpenAI says its agents accessed SEC and Census sites and leaked 53 ChatGPT user images
- UpdateOpenAI pauses model training after agents acted beyond instructions on government websites
- UpdateFlorida asks a court for an emergency injunction halting OpenAI's development of new models — this issue
DOJ asks Supreme Court to let federal prisons end hormone therapy for transgender inmates
THE NEW YORK TIMESUpdateCourts and the adminis…The Justice Department filed an emergency application asking the justices to pause Lamberth's order so the Bureau of Prisons can enforce the policy while the case continues. Judge Royce Lamberth blocked the policy in June, and the D.C. Circuit declined to revive it earlier this month.
How we got here
- Feb. 19 — The federal Bureau of Prisons adopted a policy ending hormone therapy for transgender inmates: no new prescriptions, and those already on hormones must taper off.
- June 17 — U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth blocked the policy while a lawsuit challenging it proceeds. He ruled it "arbitrary and capricious" under federal administrative law, not on constitutional grounds.
- Sept. 18 — A divided D.C. Circuit panel, 2-1, declined to revive the policy, finding the government had not shown it was likely to win. Lamberth's block stayed in place.
What the policy does
- Ends hormone therapy and sex-modification surgeries for transgender inmates.
- Ends social accommodations such as binders and wigs, but keeps mental-health care.
- Solicitor General Sauer calls the treatments "medically disputed and unproven sex-rejecting interventions."
US and China each cut tariffs on about $30 billion of non-strategic goods, with no start date
PBS NEWSHOURUpdateTariffs and tradeThe US and China each published a list of goods for lower tariffs, with no timeline. Each list covers about $30 billion, roughly 5% of the $582.5 billion the two countries traded in 2024. The lists run from corn and foie gras to toasters and live dolphins. They leave out strategic goods and soybeans. USTR Jamieson Greer says about 30% of US exports to China gain better access. China confirmed the truce runs to Jan. 10.
How we got here
- October 2025 — Trump and Xi Jinping set a trade truce in Busan, South Korea; China agreed to buy 25 million metric tons of US soybeans a year.
- November 2025 — The US cut its fentanyl-related tariff on China to 10% from 20%.
- May 2026 — The two sides set up a US-China Board of Trade during Trump's Beijing visit.
- June 5 — USTR asked for public comment on which Chinese goods should come in at lower tariff rates.
- Sept. 24 — Trump and Xi met in Washington; the summit bought only a two-month truce extension.
What's on the lists
- US list: 77 categories of Chinese products (The Guardian).
- China's list: 1,619 US product types (The Guardian).
- Trade truce now runs to Jan. 10, two months past its Nov. 10 expiry (NBC News).
Trump denies asking Xi if China wanted US weapons, then says selling them is 'maybe' a good idea
WASHINGTON EXAMINERUpdateTrump denied Ambassador to China David Perdue's account that he asked Xi Jinping whether China wanted to buy US weapons. Perdue was "probably talking about Taiwan," Trump said. Then he said China would "probably like to buy it," adding, "so maybe it's a good idea." US law bars arms sales to China, though the president can grant a national-interest exception, per SIPRI. The $14 billion Taiwan arms package is still on hold.
Catch up
- Sep. 21 — US and Chinese officials opened talks in New York on trade, AI and critical minerals ahead of Xi's Washington visit.
- Sep. 22–23 — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pitched Beijing an emergency AI incident hotline; follow-up talks were set for Shenzhen in November.
- Sep. 27 — Xi left Washington with more Trump meetings planned but no movement on AI, Taiwan or the Iran war.
- Sep. 27 — Perdue said Trump asked Xi whether China wanted to buy US weapons. The administration said no sales were planned and denied stalling a Taiwan arms package to please Beijing.
Ongoing1
This story has run 2 times, starting Sep 28.
- UpdateTrump asked Xi if China wanted to buy U.S. weapons, says U.S. Ambassador to China David Perdue; the administration says no sales are planned
- UpdateTrump denies asking Xi if China wanted US weapons, then says selling them is 'maybe' a good idea — this issue
FBI co-deputy director Andrew Bailey, who oversaw election investigations, resigns effective Oct. 2
AXIOSBailey, the former Missouri attorney general whose portfolio included the January FBI raid on Fulton County's election office, cites a return to his family in Missouri. Christopher Raia stays on as the other co-deputy under Director Kash Patel.
Around the exit
- Reports describe friction between Bailey and Patel before the exit (Washington Examiner).
- Two FBI counterterrorism supervisors were recently demoted over their handling of threats against Katie Miller (Washington Examiner).
- A senior administration official told Axios: "He did nothing on voter fraud, nothing on election integrity. He quit because he had nothing to do."
Hegseth orders Cyber Command and defense intelligence agencies to disrupt foreign interference in the midterms
AXIOS2026 midtermsDefense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed the memo on Sept. 22; it copies a 2022 Biden-era effort and sends no troops to polling places, though Trump has refused to rule that out.
The memo's three directives
- Prioritize cyber and intelligence capabilities to "identify, disrupt, and neutralize foreign interference."
- Collect intelligence on foreign threats to the midterms.
- Run joint operations between Cyber Command and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
White House weighed certified-mail-only ballots before its March mail-voting order, ProPublica reports
PROPUBLICACourts and the adminis…The idea, which ProPublica says would have virtually shut down mail voting, was dropped after postal officials called it impossible to execute. The March order then put Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who has no formal oversight of the Postal Service, in charge.
What else ProPublica found
- Postal officials were excluded from drafting the March order after they objected to the certified-mail plan.
- Postal governors stayed quiet out of fear Trump would fire them; a board source said any action "might be its last action."
- The Supreme Court has since blocked the order.
Thune breaks with Trump over $1.5 million in taxpayer-funded White House ads
TIMEUpdateSenate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said taxpayers shouldn't fund the White House's three 'PSA' ads, which have cost about $1.5 million so far. "It's a great message. I like the message. But it shouldn't be paid for with taxpayer dollars," he said. That puts him alongside Democratic appropriators who called the ads propaganda; spending bills have barred funds for "publicity or propaganda" since 1951. The White House says the ads are "clearly not political."
Sept. 28 — The White House aired a taxpayer-funded ad that reruns a 2024 Trump campaign spot, spending about $319,000 on it by Sept. 27, according to ad tracker AdImpact.
Where the money went
- About $1.5 million across all three ads so far, per AdImpact; NBC's later count puts it above $1.7 million.
- Nearly $920,000 on the 'Love Me' ad; the 'Final Battle' rerun is past $362,000, up from the $319,000 first reported.
- $315,967 on NFL and college football airtime for all three ads, Sept. 25-27.
Education Department repeals Biden's 2024 Title IX rule and restores Trump's 2020 rule
WASHINGTON EXAMINERThe 2024 rule was already dead in practice. A federal judge struck it down last year. The department says the last lawsuits over it were thrown out last month.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the move "clears the Biden Administration's illegal rewrite of Title IX from the Code of Federal Regulations."
UK lobbies privately for an exemption as Trump weighs a US diesel export ban
BLOOMBERGUpdateGoldman Sachs estimates a diesel export ban would first cut diesel about 25 cents a gallon. Once storage fills, it would add about 30 cents a gallon to gasoline for each week it lasts. Diesel averaged $6.45 Monday, just under the $6.53 record set Sept. 22.
Catch up
- Sept. 23 — Reuters reported the US was preparing a 90-day diesel export ban. A White House official denied it the same day, as Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signaled doubts about the side effects.
- Sept. 24 — Trump called for halting diesel exports.
- Sept. 28 — Trump said he was "very seriously" considering a ban.
What a ban would stop
- The US exports about 1.2 to 1.5 million barrels of diesel a day, net; outlets differ on the figure.
- 60-70% of US diesel exports go to Latin America, per BBC News.
Ongoing2
This story has run 3 times over 5 days, starting Sep 24.
- UpdateWhite House denies plans for a 90-day diesel export ban after Trump calls for halting exports
- UpdateTrump says he is ‘very seriously’ considering a U.S. diesel export ban
- UpdateUK lobbies privately for an exemption as Trump weighs a US diesel export ban — this issue
Talarico leads Paxton 47-44 in Texas Senate average; Tillis calls Trump's endorsement a 'colossal mistake'
WASHINGTON EXAMINERUpdateJames Talarico (D-TX) leads Ken Paxton (R-TX) 47-44 in the Decision Desk HQ polling average. He has led 25 of the last 30 polls, per DDHQ. Through September 2018, Beto O'Rourke led just 1 of 30. Thom Tillis (Sen-R North Carolina) said Trump made a 'colossal mistake' backing Paxton over John Cornyn (Sen-R Texas). Karl Rove said the race would be over if Cornyn were the nominee.
GOP strategist Matt Mackowiak said outside groups spent $100 million to help Paxton in September alone. AdImpact counts $98.5 million in pro-Paxton super PAC ads for the whole general election through mid-September, per Houston Public Media.
How we got here
- March 3 — Talarico won the Democratic nomination outright. Cornyn topped the GOP primary 42.0% to 40.5% but fell short of the 50% needed to avoid a runoff.
- May 26 — With Trump's endorsement, Paxton beat Cornyn in the runoff, about 64% to 36%.
- Aug. 24 — Cook Political Report moved the race to Toss Up.
- Sept. 27 — A BIG DATA POLL had Talarico ahead 43.6% to 39.3% among registered voters, about 4 points, with a Libertarian at 5.2%.
Nine states will vote on new House maps, and Republicans could net up to 9 seats, ABC News says
ABC NEWSCourts and the adminis…Nine states will vote on new House districts on Nov. 3. ABC News says Republicans could net up to nine seats if every map works as designed, and that a good Democratic year could cut that. Missouri is not on the list: on Friday, Sept. 25, the Supreme Court kept its 2022 map in place for this election. Missouri voters decide on the new Republican map in November, for 2028. Trump's mid-decade push began in Texas, whose map was enacted Aug. 29, 2025.
States using new House maps
- Favor Republicans: Florida, Louisiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, and Alabama, where the Supreme Court restored the Legislature's 2023 map in June
- Do not favor Republicans: California, Utah (map ordered by a court, not drawn by lawmakers)
Elections22 races
The midterms · 35 days out · November 3, 2026
D or R take the House / Senate?
U.S. House: chance Democrats take it, Polymarket 93%, Kalshi 91%. U.S. Senate: chance Democrats take it, Polymarket 63%, Kalshi 62%. Full day-by-day figures are in the table below.
No House district is priced by either book — the House appears here as chamber control only
Each bar is one contract: will Democrats control this chamber after the 2026 midterms. The Republican share is the arithmetic complement of that price, not a separately traded market. Republicans hold the House and the Senate, so the figure printed there is the chance Democrats take them. Two venues price each contract; where they differ the lighter wedge is how far apart they are, and the panel on the right is the week.
- two venues, priced separately
- shaded = how far apart they are
- 50% — control flips here
- where it stood 7 days ago
- the last 7 days, on its own scale
- week panel: one line a party
The week panel draws one line per party, crossing where control does. Only the Democratic line is a traded price: the Republicanline is its arithmetic complement, the same mirror the bar’s other half is, and not a second market agreeing with the first. The shading around each line is how far apart the two venues are.
Market prices are not forecasts with error bars; they are the last price two sets of traders agreed on. The gap between the venues is the closest thing here to a stated uncertainty. The bar runs 0–100%; the week panel beside it is zoomed to its own data and prints its top and bottom, because a two-point move is four pixels wide on a 0–100% scale and was previously drawn there anyway.
The two chambers are not the same kind of bet. The House sits far enough from the flip line that the venues’ disagreement barely matters; the Senate sits close enough that their 1.0pp gap / 1.0pp gap is a meaningful share of the distance to 50%.
Who is defending the House and the Senate is sourced, not remembered — House, 2026-07-23 issue: the NDAA passed “216-212, with six Democrats joining a unified Republican majority.”; Senate, 2026-08-10 issue: “Republicans hold 53 of the Senate's 100 seats.”
Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
| Day | U.S. House · Polymarket | U.S. House · Kalshi | U.S. Senate · Polymarket | U.S. Senate · Kalshi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days ago | 93% | 90% | 67% | 61% |
| 6 days ago | 93% | 91% | 63% | 63% |
| 5 days ago | 93% | 92% | 63% | 65% |
| 4 days ago | 93% | 91% | 63% | 61% |
| 3 days ago | 93% | 92% | 63% | 62% |
| 2 days ago | 93% | 92% | 63% | 62% |
| yesterday | 93% | 92% | 63% | 62% |
| today | 93% | 91% | 63% | 62% |
3 closest races
vGeorgia governorBottoms vs. JacksonBottoms52.5%Jackson51.5%books split
POLYMARKET: Georgia governor — general election
Keisha Lance Bottoms (D) faces Rick Jackson (R).
Georgia's governor's office is open, and the only race here where the two venues do not agree on who is ahead — the Republican side gained about seven points in a week.
The books name different leaders
Georgia governor
Each line is one book’s lead — the gap between the two candidates, signed. Zero is a tie, and the two venues are on opposite sides of it.
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 4.0ppGeorgia governor. Lead in percentage points, positive to Keisha Lance Bottoms. Polymarket: Bottoms ahead by 5 points. Kalshi: Jackson ahead by 1 point. Every day is in the table below.
today
- Bottoms+5%Polymarket
- Jackson+1%Kalshi
- Bottoms52.5%Polymarket
- Bottoms50.5%Kalshi
- Jackson47.5%Polymarket
- Jackson51.5%Kalshi
Market-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. The lead is the gap between the two, in points. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
The lead is one candidate’s price minus the other’s, at the same venue on the same day — never one book’s Tuesday against the other’s Thursday. It is drawn only where a venue priced both candidates, so a line starts late rather than being stretched across days it was never quoted over.
A day inside a tenth of a point is printed as levelrather than being rounded onto somebody’s side: on a chart whose whole subject is who is in front, a dead heat shown as a win is the one error that cannot be recovered from the drawing.
The markets: Keisha Lance Bottoms Polymarket, Kalshi · Rick Jackson Polymarket, Kalshi
Every price behind the chart, and the lead it produces. Georgia governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Bottoms · Polymarket Jackson · Polymarket Lead · Polymarket Bottoms · Kalshi Jackson · Kalshi Lead · Kalshi 7 days ago 55.5% 44.5% Bottoms +11% 60.0% 41.0% Bottoms +19% 6 days ago 54.5% 45.5% Bottoms +9% 60.0% 42.0% Bottoms +18% 5 days ago 54.5% 45.5% Bottoms +9% 54.0% 47.0% Bottoms +7% 4 days ago 54.5% 45.5% Bottoms +9% 53.0% 48.0% Bottoms +5% 3 days ago 51.5% 45.5% Bottoms +6% 53.0% 49.0% Bottoms +4% 2 days ago 52.5% 47.5% Bottoms +5% 51.0% 50.0% Bottoms +1% yesterday 52.5% 47.5% Bottoms +5% 51.0% 50.0% Bottoms +1% today 52.5% 47.5% Bottoms +5% 50.5% 51.5% Jackson +1% wNevada governor
POLYMARKET: Nevada governor — general election
Joe Lombardo (R) faces Aaron Ford (D).
Nevada's Republican governor is defending his job, and the Republican side holds a narrow lead — though the two venues moved in opposite directions this week.
Two markets, one question
Nevada governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Nevada governor. Joe Lombardo (R): Polymarket 51.5%, Kalshi 53.5%; Aaron Ford (D): Polymarket 47.5%, Kalshi 45.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Joe Lombardo 53% · Aaron Ford 46%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Joe Lombardo (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$118K50.5%Kalshi321K contracts · 53%/54%57.0%venue gap6.5pp7-day move+1.0ppAaron Ford (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$58.6K50.5%Kalshi570K contracts · 45%/46%44.0%venue gap6.5pp7-day move-3.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Nevada governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Joe Lombardo · Polymarket Joe Lombardo · Kalshi Aaron Ford · Polymarket Aaron Ford · Kalshi 7 days ago 50.5% 57.0% 50.5% 44.0% 6 days ago 50.0% 55.0% 49.0% 46.0% 5 days ago 50.5% 53.0% 48.5% 47.0% 4 days ago 50.5% 53.0% 49.0% 47.0% 3 days ago 50.5% 53.0% 49.5% 47.0% 2 days ago 51.5% 54.0% 47.5% 46.0% yesterday 51.5% 53.0% 47.5% 47.0% today 51.5% 53.5% 47.5% 45.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
tOhio Senate
POLYMARKET: Ohio Senate — general election
Sherrod Brown (D) faces Jon Husted (R).
A special election, to serve out the rest of someone else's Senate term, and the Democratic side holds a clear lead.
Two markets, one question
Ohio Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Ohio Senate. Sherrod Brown (D): Polymarket 57.5%, Kalshi 58.5%; Jon Husted (R): Polymarket 42.5%, Kalshi 42.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Sherrod Brown 58% · Jon Husted 42%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Sherrod Brown (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$441K62.5%Kalshi2.3M contracts · 58%/59%61.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-5.0ppJon Husted (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$311K36.5%Kalshi2.2M contracts · 42%/43%40.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move+6.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Ohio Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Sherrod Brown · Polymarket Sherrod Brown · Kalshi Jon Husted · Polymarket Jon Husted · Kalshi 7 days ago 62.5% 61.0% 36.5% 40.0% 6 days ago 58.5% 60.0% 39.5% 40.0% 5 days ago 57.5% 60.0% 41.5% 40.0% 4 days ago 57.5% 59.0% 41.5% 40.0% 3 days ago 57.5% 59.0% 41.5% 42.0% 2 days ago 57.5% 59.0% 42.5% 42.0% yesterday 57.5% 58.0% 42.5% 42.0% today 57.5% 58.5% 42.5% 42.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
The other 19 races
Senate9 of 10
qAlaska Senate
POLYMARKET: Alaska Senate — general election
Mary Peltola (D) faces Dan Sullivan (R).
A sitting Republican senator is defending this seat, and Peltola holds a commanding lead — though the two venues moved in opposite directions this week.
Two markets, one question
Alaska Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Alaska Senate. Mary Peltola (D): Polymarket 72.5%, Kalshi 73.0%; Dan Sullivan (R): Polymarket 28.5%, Kalshi 26.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Mary Peltola 73% · Dan Sullivan 28%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Mary Peltola (D)7 days agoPolymarket$668K77.5%Kalshi162K contracts · 72%/74%73.0%venue gap4.5pp7-day move-5.0ppDan Sullivan (R)7 days agoPolymarket$313K19.5%Kalshi126K contracts · 26%/27%28.0%venue gap8.5pp7-day move+9.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Alaska Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Mary Peltola · Polymarket Mary Peltola · Kalshi Dan Sullivan · Polymarket Dan Sullivan · Kalshi 7 days ago 77.5% 73% 19.5% 28.0% 6 days ago 73.5% 78% 21.5% 22.0% 5 days ago 72.5% 76% 26.5% 26.0% 4 days ago 72.5% 74% 28.5% 28.0% 3 days ago 72.5% 74% 28.5% 27.0% 2 days ago 72.5% 73% 28.5% 28.0% yesterday 72.5% 73% 29.5% 27.0% today 72.5% 73% 28.5% 26.5% yGeorgia Senate
POLYMARKET: Georgia Senate — general election
Jon Ossoff (D) faces Mike Collins (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Georgia Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 0.3pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Georgia Senate. Jon Ossoff (D): Polymarket 95.5%, Kalshi 95.8%; Mike Collins (R): Polymarket 4.05%, Kalshi 4.15%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.3pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Jon Ossoff 96% · Mike Collins 4.1%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Jon Ossoff (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$85.5K94.5%Kalshi428K contracts · 95%/97%93.9%venue gap0.6pp7-day move+1.0ppMike Collins (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$104K5.4%Kalshi1.0M contracts · 4.1%/4.2%7.0%venue gap1.6pp7-day move-1.3ppEvery sample behind the chart. Georgia Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Jon Ossoff · Polymarket Jon Ossoff · Kalshi Mike Collins · Polymarket Mike Collins · Kalshi 7 days ago 94.5% 93.9% 5.40% 7.00% 6 days ago 94.5% 93.4% 5.40% 6.10% 5 days ago 94.5% 94.2% 5.40% 5.40% 4 days ago 95.5% 94.4% 4.10% 6.50% 3 days ago 95.5% 94.9% 3.95% 6.20% 2 days ago 95.5% 94.5% 4.05% 5.90% yesterday 95.5% 94.1% 4.05% 5.70% today 95.5% 95.8% 4.05% 4.15% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
rIowa Senate
POLYMARKET: Iowa Senate — general election
Ashley Hinson (R) faces Josh Turek (D).
An open seat, with no incumbent running, and the Republican side holds a clear lead — though the two venues moved in opposite directions this week.
Two markets, one question
Iowa Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Iowa Senate. Ashley Hinson (R): Polymarket 58.5%, Kalshi 59.5%; Josh Turek (D): Polymarket 41.5%, Kalshi 40.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Ashley Hinson 59% · Josh Turek 41%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Ashley Hinson (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$306K51.5%Kalshi1.5M contracts · 59%/60%61.0%venue gap9.5pp7-day move+7.0ppJosh Turek (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$338K47.5%Kalshi2.0M contracts · 40%/41%40.0%venue gap7.5pp7-day move-6.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Iowa Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Ashley Hinson · Polymarket Ashley Hinson · Kalshi Josh Turek · Polymarket Josh Turek · Kalshi 7 days ago 51.5% 61.0% 47.5% 40.0% 6 days ago 55.5% 54.0% 45.5% 45.0% 5 days ago 56.5% 55.0% 44.0% 46.0% 4 days ago 58.5% 57.0% 41.5% 44.0% 3 days ago 58.5% 57.0% 41.5% 45.0% 2 days ago 57.5% 57.0% 41.5% 44.0% yesterday 58.5% 58.0% 41.5% 43.0% today 58.5% 59.5% 41.5% 40.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
oMaine Senate
POLYMARKET: Maine Senate — general election
Troy Jackson (D) faces Susan Collins (R).
Democrats only got a candidate here after their primary winner withdrew, and the Democratic side holds a clear lead, but no race here has moved more this week: it is down about eleven points.
Two markets, one question
Maine Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Maine Senate. Troy Jackson (D): Polymarket 61.0%, Kalshi 59.5%; Susan Collins (R): Polymarket 38.5%, Kalshi 40.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Troy Jackson 60% · Susan Collins 40%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Troy Jackson (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$1.2M73.5%Kalshi3.3M contracts · 59%/60%68.0%venue gap5.5pp7-day move-13ppSusan Collins (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$858K26.5%Kalshi3.6M contracts · 40%/41%33.0%venue gap6.5pp7-day move+12ppEvery sample behind the chart. Maine Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Troy Jackson · Polymarket Troy Jackson · Kalshi Susan Collins · Polymarket Susan Collins · Kalshi 7 days ago 73.5% 68.0% 26.5% 33.0% 6 days ago 73.5% 72.0% 30.5% 30.0% 5 days ago 69.5% 74.0% 33.5% 28.0% 4 days ago 66.5% 65.0% 34.5% 35.0% 3 days ago 64.5% 63.0% 40.5% 37.0% 2 days ago 60.5% 61.0% 38.5% 40.0% yesterday 60.5% 60.0% 38.5% 41.0% today 61.0% 59.5% 38.5% 40.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
sMichigan Senate
POLYMARKET: Michigan Senate — general election
Abdul El-Sayed (D) faces Mike Rogers (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead — though the two venues moved in opposite directions this week.
Two markets, one question
Michigan Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Michigan Senate. Abdul El-Sayed (D): Polymarket 70.5%, Kalshi 71.5%; Mike Rogers (R): Polymarket 30.5%, Kalshi 28.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Abdul El-Sayed 71% · Mike Rogers 29%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Abdul El-Sayed (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$644K72.5%Kalshi2.0M contracts · 71%/72%67.0%venue gap5.5pp7-day move-2.0ppMike Rogers (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$505K27%Kalshi2.7M contracts · 28%/29%34%venue gap7.0pp7-day move+3.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. Michigan Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Abdul El-Sayed · Polymarket Abdul El-Sayed · Kalshi Mike Rogers · Polymarket Mike Rogers · Kalshi 7 days ago 72.5% 67.0% 27.0% 34.0% 6 days ago 71.5% 72.0% 28.5% 29.0% 5 days ago 71.5% 74.0% 28.5% 26.0% 4 days ago 70.5% 74.0% 29.5% 28.0% 3 days ago 70.5% 73.0% 29.5% 28.0% 2 days ago 70.5% 72.0% 30.5% 29.0% yesterday 70.5% 72.0% 30.5% 29.0% today 70.5% 71.5% 30.5% 28.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
zNebraska Senate
POLYMARKET: Nebraska Senate — general election
Pete Ricketts (R) faces Dan Osborn (I).
The Republican side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Nebraska Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Nebraska Senate. Pete Ricketts (R): Polymarket 69.5%, Kalshi 70.5%; Dan Osborn (I): Polymarket 30.5%, Kalshi 28.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Pete Ricketts 70% · Dan Osborn 29%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Pete Ricketts (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$242K67.5%Kalshi1.1M contracts · 70%/71%69.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move+2.0ppDan Osborn (I)7 days agoPolymarket$113K32.5%Kalshi739K contracts · 28%/29%31.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-2.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Nebraska Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Pete Ricketts · Polymarket Pete Ricketts · Kalshi Dan Osborn · Polymarket Dan Osborn · Kalshi 7 days ago 67.5% 69.0% 32.5% 31.0% 6 days ago 69.5% 68.0% 31.5% 31.0% 5 days ago 69.5% 67.0% 30.5% 35.0% 4 days ago 69.5% 73.0% 30.5% 29.0% 3 days ago 69.5% 71.0% 30.5% 31.0% 2 days ago 69.5% 70.0% 30.5% 30.0% yesterday 69.5% 70.0% 30.5% 29.0% today 69.5% 70.5% 30.5% 28.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
aaNew Hampshire Senate
POLYMARKET: New Hampshire Senate — general election
Chris Pappas (D) faces John E. Sununu (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
New Hampshire Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
New Hampshire Senate. Chris Pappas (D): Polymarket 86.5%, Kalshi 85.5%; John E. Sununu (R): Polymarket 14.5%, Kalshi 14.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Chris Pappas 86% · John E. Sununu 15%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Chris Pappas (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$130K85.5%Kalshi423K contracts · 85%/86%83.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move+1.0ppJohn E. Sununu (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$133K14%Kalshi982K contracts · 14%/15%18%venue gap4.0pp7-day move+0.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. New Hampshire Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Chris Pappas · Polymarket Chris Pappas · Kalshi John E. Sununu · Polymarket John E. Sununu · Kalshi 7 days ago 85.5% 83.0% 14.0% 18.0% 6 days ago 85.0% 85.0% 14.5% 17.0% 5 days ago 85.5% 85.0% 14.5% 16.0% 4 days ago 86.5% 86.0% 14.0% 15.0% 3 days ago 85.0% 85.0% 13.5% 14.0% 2 days ago 86.5% 86.0% 14.5% 15.0% yesterday 86.5% 85.0% 14.5% 15.0% today 86.5% 85.5% 14.5% 14.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
xNorth Carolina Senate
POLYMARKET: North Carolina Senate — general election
Roy Cooper (D) faces Michael Whatley (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
North Carolina Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.3pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
North Carolina Senate. Roy Cooper (D): Polymarket 95.50%, Kalshi 94.25%; Michael Whatley (R): Polymarket 5.5%, Kalshi 6.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.3pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Roy Cooper 94% · Michael Whatley 6.0%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Roy Cooper (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$104K94.5%Kalshi1.4M contracts · 94%/94%92.7%venue gap1.8pp7-day move+1.0ppMichael Whatley (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$96.9K6.5%Kalshi953K contracts · 5.8%/6.2%7.9%venue gap1.4pp7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. North Carolina Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Roy Cooper · Polymarket Roy Cooper · Kalshi Michael Whatley · Polymarket Michael Whatley · Kalshi 7 days ago 94.5% 92.70% 6.5% 7.9% 6 days ago 94.5% 93.00% 6.5% 7.0% 5 days ago 94.5% 93.50% 6.5% 6.5% 4 days ago 95.5% 93.30% 5.5% 6.9% 3 days ago 95.5% 93.60% 5.5% 6.2% 2 days ago 95.5% 93.60% 5.5% 6.5% yesterday 95.5% 93.60% 5.5% 6.7% today 95.5% 94.25% 5.5% 6.0% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
pTexas Senate
POLYMARKET: Texas Senate — general election
James Talarico (D) faces Ken Paxton (R).
The Democratic side holds a clear lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Texas Senate
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Texas Senate. James Talarico (D): Polymarket 60.5%, Kalshi 59.5%; Ken Paxton (R): Polymarket 39.5%, Kalshi 40.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: James Talarico 60% · Ken Paxton 40%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
James Talarico (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$732K61.5%Kalshi6.3M contracts · 59%/60%59.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move-1.0ppKen Paxton (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$833K38.5%Kalshi8.9M contracts · 40%/41%42.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move+1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Texas Senate, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day James Talarico · Polymarket James Talarico · Kalshi Ken Paxton · Polymarket Ken Paxton · Kalshi 7 days ago 61.5% 59.0% 38.5% 42.0% 6 days ago 62.5% 59.0% 38.5% 42.0% 5 days ago 60.5% 59.0% 39.5% 43.0% 4 days ago 61.5% 59.0% 39.5% 43.0% 3 days ago 60.5% 62.0% 39.5% 40.0% 2 days ago 60.5% 60.0% 39.5% 40.0% yesterday 60.5% 60.0% 39.5% 41.0% today 60.5% 59.5% 39.5% 40.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
Governors10 of 12
acAlaska governor
POLYMARKET: Alaska governor — general election
Bernadette Wilson (R) faces Tom Begich (D).
Wilson holds a clear lead after gaining about five points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Alaska governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Alaska governor. Bernadette Wilson (R): Polymarket 19.5%, Kalshi 18.0%; Tom Begich (D): Polymarket 1.25%, Kalshi 0.80%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Bernadette Wilson 19% · Tom Begich 1.0%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Bernadette Wilson (R)7 days agoPolymarket$183K15.5%Kalshi56.8K contracts · 17%/19%12.0%venue gap3.5pp7-day move+4.0ppTom Begich (D)7 days agoPolymarket$166K1.05%Kalshi246K contracts · 0.6%/1.0%0.30%venue gap0.8pp7-day move+0.2ppEvery sample behind the chart. Alaska governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Bernadette Wilson · Polymarket Bernadette Wilson · Kalshi Tom Begich · Polymarket Tom Begich · Kalshi 7 days ago 15.5% 12% 1.05% 0.3% 6 days ago 19.0% 13% 1.05% 0.3% 5 days ago 19.5% 16% 1.30% 0.4% 4 days ago 19.5% 17% 1.30% 0.3% 3 days ago 19.5% 18% 1.30% 0.6% 2 days ago 19.5% 17% 1.25% 0.3% yesterday 19.5% 19% 1.25% 1.0% today 19.5% 18% 1.25% 0.8% aeArizona governor
POLYMARKET: Arizona governor — general election
Katie Hobbs (D) faces Andy Biggs (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Arizona governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Arizona governor. Katie Hobbs (D): Polymarket 88.5%, Kalshi 88.5%; Andy Biggs (R): Polymarket 10.5%, Kalshi 12.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Katie Hobbs 89% · Andy Biggs 12%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Katie Hobbs (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$42.4K88.5%Kalshi345K contracts · 88%/89%88.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move0.0ppAndy Biggs (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$45.8K12.5%Kalshi275K contracts · 12%/13%13.0%venue gap0.5pp7-day move-2.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Arizona governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Katie Hobbs · Polymarket Katie Hobbs · Kalshi Andy Biggs · Polymarket Andy Biggs · Kalshi 7 days ago 88.5% 88.0% 12.5% 13.0% 6 days ago 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 12.0% 5 days ago 88.5% 90.0% 10.5% 12.0% 4 days ago 88.5% 90.0% 10.5% 13.0% 3 days ago 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 13.0% 2 days ago 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 13.0% yesterday 88.5% 89.0% 10.5% 13.0% today 88.5% 88.5% 10.5% 12.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
aiFlorida governor
POLYMARKET: Florida governor — general election
Byron Donalds (R) faces David Jolly (D).
Florida's governor's office is open, and the Republican side holds a commanding lead — though the two venues moved in opposite directions this week.
Two markets, one question
Florida governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Florida governor. Byron Donalds (R): Polymarket 78.5%, Kalshi 77.5%; David Jolly (D): Polymarket 22.5%, Kalshi 23.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Byron Donalds 78% · David Jolly 23%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Byron Donalds (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$112K72.5%Kalshi1.6M contracts · 77%/78%81.0%venue gap8.5pp7-day move+6.0ppDavid Jolly (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$124K27.5%Kalshi712K contracts · 23%/24%20.0%venue gap7.5pp7-day move-5.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Florida governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Byron Donalds · Polymarket Byron Donalds · Kalshi David Jolly · Polymarket David Jolly · Kalshi 7 days ago 72.5% 81.0% 27.5% 20.0% 6 days ago 78.0% 77.0% 22.5% 24.0% 5 days ago 77.5% 74.0% 21.5% 27.0% 4 days ago 78.0% 79.0% 21.5% 22.0% 3 days ago 79.5% 79.0% 21.5% 23.0% 2 days ago 78.5% 78.0% 21.5% 23.0% yesterday 78.5% 79.0% 22.5% 22.0% today 78.5% 77.5% 22.5% 23.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
abIowa governor
POLYMARKET: Iowa governor — general election
Rob Sand (D) faces Zach Lahn (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead after the Republican side lost about four points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Iowa governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 2.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Iowa governor. Rob Sand (D): Polymarket 84.5%, Kalshi 83.5%; Zach Lahn (R): Polymarket 13.5%, Kalshi 16.0%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 2.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Rob Sand 84% · Zach Lahn 16%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Rob Sand (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$54.9K83%Kalshi406K contracts · 83%/84%80%venue gap3.0pp7-day move+1.5ppZach Lahn (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$54.6K16.5%Kalshi392K contracts · 15%/17%21.0%venue gap4.5pp7-day move-3.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Iowa governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Rob Sand · Polymarket Rob Sand · Kalshi Zach Lahn · Polymarket Zach Lahn · Kalshi 7 days ago 83.0% 80.0% 16.5% 21% 6 days ago 82.0% 82.0% 16.0% 19% 5 days ago 83.5% 83.0% 15.5% 18% 4 days ago 83.5% 83.0% 15.5% 18% 3 days ago 88.0% 83.0% 11.0% 16% 2 days ago 87.5% 84.0% 13.5% 18% yesterday 84.5% 85.0% 13.5% 16% today 84.5% 83.5% 13.5% 16% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
adMichigan governor
POLYMARKET: Michigan governor — general election
Jocelyn Benson (D) faces John James (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Michigan governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.3pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Michigan governor. Jocelyn Benson (D): Polymarket 92.5%, Kalshi 92.2%; John James (R): Polymarket 6.50%, Kalshi 7.85%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.3pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Jocelyn Benson 92% · John James 7.2%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Jocelyn Benson (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$50.8K92.5%Kalshi78.9K contracts · 92%/93%91.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move0.0ppJohn James (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$157K6.5%Kalshi157K contracts · 7.0%/8.7%8.1%venue gap1.6pp7-day move0.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Michigan governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Jocelyn Benson · Polymarket Jocelyn Benson · Kalshi John James · Polymarket John James · Kalshi 7 days ago 92.5% 91.0% 6.5% 8.10% 6 days ago 92.5% 92.8% 6.5% 8.00% 5 days ago 92.5% 92.7% 6.5% 8.90% 4 days ago 92.5% 92.0% 6.5% 7.70% 3 days ago 92.5% 92.1% 6.5% 7.90% 2 days ago 92.5% 92.9% 6.5% 8.00% yesterday 92.5% 91.9% 6.5% 8.70% today 92.5% 92.2% 6.5% 7.85% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
agNew York governor
POLYMARKET: New York governor — general election
Kathy Hochul (D) faces Bruce Blakeman (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
New York governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.1pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
New York governor. Kathy Hochul (D): Polymarket 95.5%, Kalshi 94.6%; Bruce Blakeman (R): Polymarket 4.5%, Kalshi 5.6%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.1pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Kathy Hochul 95% · Bruce Blakeman 5.5%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Kathy Hochul (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$55.4K95.0%Kalshi414K contracts · 94%/95%93.2%venue gap1.8pp7-day move+0.5ppBruce Blakeman (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$72.0K5.0%Kalshi1.3M contracts · 5.4%/5.8%6.7%venue gap1.7pp7-day move-0.5ppEvery sample behind the chart. New York governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Kathy Hochul · Polymarket Kathy Hochul · Kalshi Bruce Blakeman · Polymarket Bruce Blakeman · Kalshi 7 days ago 95.0% 93.2% 5.0% 6.7% 6 days ago 95.0% 93.5% 4.5% 6.5% 5 days ago 95.0% 94.2% 4.5% 6.3% 4 days ago 95.5% 94.5% 4.5% 5.7% 3 days ago 95.5% 94.6% 4.5% 6.1% 2 days ago 95.5% 94.0% 4.5% 6.1% yesterday 95.5% 94.7% 4.5% 6.1% today 95.5% 94.6% 4.5% 5.6% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
nOhio governor
POLYMARKET: Ohio governor — general election
Amy Acton (D) faces Vivek Ramaswamy (R).
Ohio is choosing a new governor, and the Democratic side holds a clear lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Ohio governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 1.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Ohio governor. Amy Acton (D): Polymarket 60.5%, Kalshi 60.5%; Vivek Ramaswamy (R): Polymarket 40.5%, Kalshi 41.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 1.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Amy Acton 60% · Vivek Ramaswamy 41%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Amy Acton (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$111K60.5%Kalshi848K contracts · 60%/61%59.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move0.0ppVivek Ramaswamy (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$129K41.5%Kalshi958K contracts · 41%/42%43.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Ohio governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Amy Acton · Polymarket Amy Acton · Kalshi Vivek Ramaswamy · Polymarket Vivek Ramaswamy · Kalshi 7 days ago 60.5% 59.0% 41.5% 43.0% 6 days ago 62.5% 61.0% 38.5% 41.0% 5 days ago 63.5% 62.0% 36.5% 40.0% 4 days ago 63.5% 60.0% 35.5% 40.0% 3 days ago 62.5% 61.0% 36.5% 39.0% 2 days ago 61.5% 62.0% 36.5% 39.0% yesterday 60.5% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0% today 60.5% 60.5% 40.5% 41.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
ahPennsylvania governor
POLYMARKET: Pennsylvania governor — general election
Josh Shapiro (D) faces Stacy Garrity (R).
The Democratic side holds a commanding lead.
Two markets, one question
Pennsylvania governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 0.6pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Pennsylvania governor. Josh Shapiro (D): Polymarket 96.9%, Kalshi 97.5%; Stacy Garrity (R): Polymarket 2.65%, Kalshi 2.60%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 0.6pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Series run 7–8 samples because the venues listed these markets on different days; a short line starts late rather than being stretched across a week it was never priced over.
Money-weighted: Josh Shapiro 97% · Stacy Garrity 2.6%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Josh Shapiro (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$7.5K96.45%Kalshi104K contracts · 97%/98%—venue gap—7-day move+0.4ppStacy Garrity (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$42.4K2.95%Kalshi405K contracts · 2.5%/2.7%—venue gap—7-day move-0.3ppEvery sample behind the chart. Pennsylvania governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Josh Shapiro · Polymarket Josh Shapiro · Kalshi Stacy Garrity · Polymarket Stacy Garrity · Kalshi 7 days ago 96.45% — 2.95% — 6 days ago 96.70% 96.4% 2.95% 2.8% 5 days ago 97.00% 97.2% 2.60% 2.8% 4 days ago 97.20% 97.5% 2.65% 2.9% 3 days ago 97.05% 97.7% 2.65% 2.8% 2 days ago 96.90% 97.4% 2.65% 2.6% yesterday 96.90% 97.7% 2.65% 2.8% today 96.90% 97.5% 2.65% 2.6% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
afTexas governor
POLYMARKET: Texas governor — general election
Greg Abbott (R) faces Gina Hinojosa (D).
The Republican side holds a commanding lead after gaining about five points in a week.
Two markets, one question
Texas governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 3.0pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Texas governor. Greg Abbott (R): Polymarket 81.95%, Kalshi 80.50%; Gina Hinojosa (D): Polymarket 17.5%, Kalshi 20.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 3.0pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: Greg Abbott 81% · Gina Hinojosa 20%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
Greg Abbott (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$166K74.65%Kalshi356K contracts · 80%/81%77.00%venue gap2.3pp7-day move+7.3ppGina Hinojosa (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$150K25.5%Kalshi985K contracts · 20%/21%23.0%venue gap2.5pp7-day move-8.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Texas governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day Greg Abbott · Polymarket Greg Abbott · Kalshi Gina Hinojosa · Polymarket Gina Hinojosa · Kalshi 7 days ago 74.65% 77.0% 25.5% 23.0% 6 days ago 73.75% 72.0% 25.5% 29.0% 5 days ago 79.25% 75.0% 21.5% 26.0% 4 days ago 79.45% 76.0% 21.5% 25.0% 3 days ago 83.50% 79.0% 17.0% 22.0% 2 days ago 84.15% 79.0% 15.5% 23.0% yesterday 82.30% 80.0% 17.5% 22.0% today 81.95% 80.5% 17.5% 20.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
uWisconsin governor
POLYMARKET: Wisconsin governor — general election
David Crowley (D) faces Tom Tiffany (R).
An open governorship, and the Democratic side holds a commanding lead that has barely moved in a week.
Two markets, one question
Wisconsin governor
Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT
widest venue gap 3.5pp- Polymarket, solid
- Kalshi, dashed
- shaded = the gap between them
Wisconsin governor. David Crowley (D): Polymarket 85.5%, Kalshi 82.0%; Tom Tiffany (R): Polymarket 14.5%, Kalshi 16.5%. Widest disagreement between the two venues: 3.5pp. Full history is in the table below.
7 days agoMarket-implied chance of winning, out of 100 — prices, not polls. Source: Polymarket · Kalshi.
Prices are what each venue’s traders were paying, right-aligned to the snapshot: the last sample is today, the one before it yesterday. Every series here is 8 samples long.
Money-weighted: David Crowley 83% · Tom Tiffany 16%. Volume is each venue's own reported figure — Polymarket in USD, Kalshi in contracts. They are not a common unit, so read the weighting as a tilt, not a conversion.
David Crowley (D)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$330K85%Kalshi484K contracts · 81%/83%82%venue gap3.0pp7-day move+0.5ppTom Tiffany (R)7 days ago · party contractPolymarket$287K15.5%Kalshi754K contracts · 16%/17%17.0%venue gap1.5pp7-day move-1.0ppEvery sample behind the chart. Wisconsin governor, snapshot Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. Day David Crowley · Polymarket David Crowley · Kalshi Tom Tiffany · Polymarket Tom Tiffany · Kalshi 7 days ago 85.0% 82% 15.5% 17.0% 6 days ago 85.0% 84% 15.5% 17.0% 5 days ago 85.5% 84% 14.5% 16.0% 4 days ago 85.5% 84% 14.5% 17.0% 3 days ago 85.5% 83% 14.5% 18.0% 2 days ago 85.5% 84% 14.5% 17.0% yesterday 85.5% 84% 14.5% 17.0% today 85.5% 82% 14.5% 16.5% These contracts price the party, not the named person — the venues list the seat before the nominee is settled.
“Still in doubt” means no leader above 80% on either book. Prices captured Sep 28, 10:32 PM CT. These are trader-implied estimates, not polls. Separate contracts trade independently, so opposing prices may not add to exactly 100%.
Not news news3 stories
Department officials project the new-car mix flipping from 70% light trucks to 70% passenger cars.
The rule. The Transportation Department on Monday, Sept. 28 released its final replacement for Biden's 2024 fuel economy standards (CAFE, the average mileage each automaker's whole lineup must hit). It also drops the incentives that rewarded electric vehicles. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said it "ended the illegal mandate that forced automakers to produce more expensive electric vehicles that American families didn't want."
The claim. The administration says new cars will cost $1,300 less on average and consumers will save $138 billion over five years. ([TS]December's proposal said $930 a car; the jump to $1,300 comes with no published explanation, per the Guardian)
The pushback. Gas averaged $4.47 a gallon Monday, per AAA, up from $2.98 before the war with Iran. "Trump is tanking sensible mile per gallon standards at the worst possible time for consumers," said Dan Becker of the Center for Biological Diversity.
On Saturday, Sept. 26, Trump said he had signed off on new fuel economy standards to replace Biden's 2024 rule, which he calls an "EV mandate."
What the rule scraps and rewrites before 2031
- A credit-trading program set to start in 2028, which would have let EV makers sell credits to automakers that fell short, is scrapped
- The rule rewrites standards back to model year 2022 and covers ten model years; the law caps a standard at five, the likeliest hook for a court challenge (DLA Piper)
- Vehicles get reclassified between light trucks and passenger cars starting in 2030, a year before the endpoint
2031 fuel economy targets vs. today's fleet (miles per gallon)
A federal judge refused on July 29 to pause the rules while 25 states sue, so the work requirement starts Jan. 1, 2027.
Medicaid work requirements from Trump's 2025 tax law start in January. People who cannot meet them because of poor health can claim a medical-frailty exemption (a waiver for those too sick to work). In the first year, federal rules let states take people at their word on that claim. At least six Republican-led states will not. Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, New Hampshire, North Carolina and Ohio will demand documentation instead. They are declining an option, not breaking the rule.
The case for. Jonathan Ingram of the Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative policy group: “Self-attestation is fraud-by-design.”
The case against. KFF's Jennifer Tolbert says people too sick to work often can't afford the doctor visit that would prove it: “Medicaid is saying you need documentation from a provider.” Advocates warn this will block new applicants.
What next. Democrats in 25 states are suing over the rules, and the requirements begin in January 2027.
What the paperwork rule adds before and after enrollment
- Worth knowingStarting work after you enroll is not enough. You must already have met the requirement in the month before applying, or the three months before in Idaho and Indiana.
- From Jan. 1, 2028, every state must verify exemptions with data or documents, so the six states are moving a year early.
Related reading
Read more about: Five Medicaid enrollees sue in Maryland over the rule's strict test for a frailty exemption
Enrollees from five states filed in federal court in Maryland. They challenge the rule's demand that a condition 'significantly impair' a person's ability to meet the work test. One plaintiff is a 25-year-old Missouri man who relies on Medicaid for autism and OCD treatment. No emergency pause has been requested.
In one scenario the paper describes, a year of AI progress happens in weeks. The authors say that outcome is far from certain.
The paper. A white paper released Monday, Sept. 28, warns that AI that automates its own development could set off an "intelligence explosion": each new system builds a better one, faster than people can check the work. In one scenario the paper describes, a year of AI progress happens in weeks.
The names. The authors include Geoffrey Hinton, OpenAI's chief scientist, Microsoft's chief scientific officer and Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark.
The evidence. They point to evidence that systems at OpenAI and Anthropic already do some of those companies' own research. They warn the "window for action may close" once AI starts improving itself.
The limits. They also list four limits that could stop it: computing capacity, automation challenges, diminishing returns and slow training runs.
BackgroundWhat the labs' own numbers say AI already does
- Anthropic's merged code written by AI: low single digits in January 2025, over 80% by May 2026.
- Anthropic research led by AI under light human supervision: 1% in March 2026, 26% by August 2026.
- OpenAI's research arm ran 3.1 AI agent-workdays per human workday by mid-August 2026. More than half of its successful 4-to-8-hour agent tasks still needed a human to step in.
